1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
agasfer [191]
3 years ago
13

Post a discussion about Rome relating Roman polytheistic religions, Judaism, Christianity or its relation to all three systems o

f worship
History
1 answer:
Klio2033 [76]3 years ago
3 0
Rome had since its beginning a polytheistic religion inspired from the greek one, but as they expand and became an empire they realized that forcing their religion onto every culture conquered by them difficult the occupation, so it was common that some colonies were allowed their own religious practices. When Rome conquered Palestine, they allowed Judaism to continue. That's why when Jesus Christ was born, Palestine society was jewish event during roman occupation. The changes occured 200 years later, when Christianity reached popularity levels so high the Emperor was pressured to change Rome's official religion from polytheistic to Christianity. Finally, this decision helped Christianity to expand all over Europe, making Polytheistic practices more and more uncommon. And Judaism remained in Palestine as it always had.
You might be interested in
What happened as a result of J.P. Morgan’s work in the financial industry?
MArishka [77]

I believe its B but i might be wrong IDK

4 0
3 years ago
Using the Internet, find one image that represents the views of government of Aristotle, one image that represents the views of
krok68 [10]
I'll give you some thoughts on the political views of the thinkers named. It's up to you to search for images and write your descriptions.

Aristotle believed there were three valid types of government, depending on the size and scope of what was to be governed or upon local situations. (He studied the constitutions of various governments as part of his work in writing <em />his work, <em>Politics.</em>)  As state with a sole ruler ruling rightly is a monarchy.  If that form of state is abused, it becomes tyranny.  A state with a number of members of the ruling class is an aristocracy -- rule by the excellent ones, noble men suited for governing.  If it is corrupted by having a few rule but not of noble character or in a noble way, Aristotle referred to that as an oligarchy (rule by a few).  A state in which all worthy men participate in governing Aristotle termed a polity, a constitutional government.  He saw it as a corruption, though, to have a full democracy (rule by the people), which would become the sort of thing we call mob rule.

Aquinas picked up thoughts from Aristotle, who had favored a monarchy.  Aquinas, writing from a Christian perspective, wrote about the righteous and proper sort of ruler who would serve as God's appointed leader among the people, truly caring for them (not becoming a tyrant).

Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx were partners in establishing communism as a political ideology.  Engels and Marx believed that in time, class struggles between overlords and those beneath them would give way to a society in which all ruled and lived and worked collectively.
3 0
3 years ago
What were two results of the spanish american war
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

Lots of people died

Explanation:

:-0

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone arguing that government is important would likely mention which two pieces of evidence?
Finger [1]

It is essential to have a government because, in its absence, people would be unable to differentiate between good and evil. If there were no governments, the well-being of the people would be in continual jeopardy.

This is further explained below.

<h3>Someone arguing that government is important would likely mention which two pieces of evidence?</h3>

Generally, A state or town that is governed by an organized group of people is said to have a government.

Protection of people's rights, maintenance of order, administration of justice, and other governmental duties and responsibilities.

Without a functioning government, the rights of the populace of a nation's constituents are susceptible to being infringed upon. People need the protection of their lives, their property, and their freedom from the government. People do not have anything to worry about from the government since they are all treated equally.

In conclusion, we may reach the conclusion that a government is essential for any country because it protects its citizens by upholding their fundamental rights. People do not need to be afraid of their living situation since the government ensures that they are always protected by the most powerful authority.

Therefore, the response that is accurate is that civilians would not know right from wrong in the absence of government. If there were no governments, the well-being of the people would be in continual jeopardy.

Read more about government

brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
The Arabian Peninsula is bordered by what four bodies of water
Rudik [331]
There are 5 bodies that surround the Arabian Peninsula...
Red Sea
Straits of Tiran
Indian Ocean
Straits of Hormuz
Persian Gulf
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Japan ignored the warnings presented by the Allies in the Potsdam Declaration and continued to fight. Which of the following con
    7·1 answer
  • Customs inspectors americanized immigrants by
    5·1 answer
  • In the late 1840's, what led to the question of whether slavery should expand to the territories?
    7·1 answer
  • What movement in the 1700's and 1800s increased the demand for cotton? *
    8·1 answer
  • An autocray gives the ruler the power to​
    9·1 answer
  • Cultural bonds like people who share the same religion are an example of what makes up a formal region.
    11·1 answer
  • When the United States in a world war one is supported the militaries efforts of which of these pairs of nations
    14·1 answer
  • How was president Lincoln able to change the meaning of War by issuing the emancipation proclamation
    15·2 answers
  • Please help❤️❤️❤️
    14·1 answer
  • How did the passage of the voting rights act of 1965 impact political participation?.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!