Answer: It's true, this is an example of consumer misbehavior, however there are some factors to consider.
Explanation: Although it is pretty evident that Michelle bought the dress in the first place because she liked it, what was done afterwards can be labeled as misbehavior for her plan to have the money back despite the article she already used for the ocassion she planned to attend with it. However, the cashier plays his/her part with the story because there is no evidence of refusal coming from what Michelle intends to do.
Answer:
Explanation:
Often they are on a trade expedition. Caravans were used mainly in desert areas and throughout the Silk Road. Traveling in groups aided in defense against bandits, in the same way that convoys at sea helped protect against piracy. It also helped improve economies of scale in trade.
Answer:
Supply side economics
Explanation:
Supply side economics aims to incentivize businesses with tax cuts, whereas demand side economics enhances job opportunities by creating public works projects and other government projects. … In contrast, demand-side economics focuses specifically on creating government jobs, so consumers feel more comfortable spending
Under the Articles of Confederation, the principle of "republicanism" helps explain why the federal government had so little power over the states, since Republicanism stood for strong individual and state rights as opposed to strong federal rights.
In general terms, most human beings are committed to obeying the law. However, to give a well-founded answer it's important to take into consideration the concepts of <em>ethics </em>and <em>morality</em> and also the cultures involved in this matter. Having said that, in the dilemma of a person being forced to choose between breaking the law to help a friend or not breaking the law but disappointing a friend, the results I would expect are the following:
The Hindu population (adults and children), based on the complex and inherent concept of <em>Dharma, </em>which assigns a high value to right conduct, ethics and morality, would tend to prioritise the obedience to law while the group of Americans would probably hesitate in this forced decision. Some psychology specialists talk about a moral crisis in America in which the limits of moral conviction, virtues and vices, good and evil, right and wrong are not very clear. If this applies to a vast part of American society, they would not be expected to choose law obedience in first place.
