Answer:
The deductible expense = $570
Explanation:
First, the question is not complete, the complete question is as follows
Gwen, an independent consultant, traveled to New York City on a business trip. Gwen spent 4 days in business meetings and conferences and then spent 2 days sightseeing in the area. Gwen's plane fare for the trip was $250. Meals cost $160 per day. Hotels and other incidental expenses amounted to $250 per day.Gwen was not reimbursed by her employer for any expenses. Her AGI for the year is $50,000 and she itemizes but has no other miscellaneous itemized deductions. Gwen may deduct (after limitations).
Solution
How much is the plane fare $250
How much was spent on means $640 (160 a day x 4 days)
Subtract: 50% of meal costs ($320) 0.5 x 640
Hotel Expense was $1,000 ($250 x 4 days)
The total is $1,570
Subtract 2% of the AGI <u> $1,000</u> (0.02 x 50,000)
The final deductible expense $570
This means the amount that Gwen can deduct from the expenses for the trip after the limitations as calculated above is $570
Answer:
Ace Incorporated
The cost of inventory as of June 30 is:
= $4,000.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
June 1 Beginning Inventory $0
June 3 Purchased goods for $4,100
June 5 Returned goods costing($1,100)
June 6 Purchased goods for $1,000
June 30 Total available $4,000
b) The cost of inventory is made up of the cost of purchasing the inventory minus purchase returns. In this instance, there were no sales during June. This would have reduced the cost of the inventory available as of June 30.
Answer:
Volume variance= $1,800 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard fixed overhead per direct labor hour $3
Standard direct labor hours per unit 0.75
Budgeted production 3100
Budgeted fixed overhead costs $6975.00
Actual production in units 3900
Actual fixed overhead costs incurred $2200.00
To calculate the fixed overhead volume variance, we need to use the following formula:
Volume variance= budgeted fixed overhead - fixed overhead applied
Volume variance= 6,975 - [3*(3,900*0.75)]
Volume variance= 6,975 - 8,775= $1,800 unfavorable
Answer:
The correct answer are: peripheral route; you do not have strong arguments for why your product is superior
Explanation:
The peripheral route, instead of examining the relevant arguments for the matter, individuals examine the message quickly or focus on simple indicators that help them decide whether to accept or reject the position advocated in the message. The elements that are peripheral to the arguments of the message are those that take center stage. These may include the communicator's physical attractiveness, the direct style of speaking, or the pleasant association between the message and the music that is heard in the background. Sometimes, the strength of the arguments is of secondary or almost null importance. Sometimes we lack the motivation, ability or time to reflect carefully. If we are disinterested, distracted or busy, we may not take the time to analyze the content of the message. Instead of analyzing whether the arguments are convincing, we will most likely follow the peripheral route, focusing on clues and indicators that activate automatic acceptance without too much cognitive processing. Peripheral processing allows communicators to design simple claims and messages to influence individuals. Although on many occasions this route may seem like the panacea of contemporary persuasion, the truth is that a good part of it is also carried out through mechanisms that involve careful and reflective considerations of the message's arguments, since, as we have indicated, When people have some motivation or are able to process messages, they are not based exclusively on peripheral cues and signals, or necessarily fall into the tricks of the persuader. When processing peripherally, people always rely on simple rules, to make decisions, "heuristic." For example the "heuristic" that experts should be believed and only for this reason accept the recommendation of a speaker, the heuristic "if many people think that something is good, then it should be" or those of reputation, consistency and security apparent in the argument. Peripheral and superficial processing does not produce profound and lasting changes of opinion. The effects of surface processing are ephemeral but relevant enough to convince an undecided voter or push a consumer towards the purchase of one or another product.
Answer:
the beta be for the other stock in your portfolio is 1.73
Explanation:
The computation of the beta be for the other stock in your portfolio is shown below:
Given that
risk free asset contains the beta of 0
And,
market beta = 1
Now
1 = 1 ÷ 3 × 0 + 1 ÷ 3 × 1.27 + 1 ÷ 3 × beta
The beta of other stock = 1.73
hence, the beta be for the other stock in your portfolio is 1.73
Here we assume that one-third should be invested in all 3 things each
