Answer:
Under government bankruptcy laws of the United States, anybody can declare financial insolvency in order to look for help from leasers. In any case, this comes to the detriment of harming one's financial assessments for quite a while (now and then upto a multi year time span) alongside bringing about critical lawful,, procedural and court charges.
That being stated, liquidations are significantly troublesome procedures essentially in light of the fact that loan bosses would not need any account holder to take the easy way off in the event that the indebted person wouldn't like to restitution. This is considerably progressively evident if there should be an occurrence of understudy advances where the borrower (Kay for this situation) needs to demonstrate without sensible uncertainty that he/she would confront "undue hardship" in the event that he/she were to continue with credit reimbursements. The "undue hardship" demonstrating part is available to an assortment of understandings, rounds of questioning and lawful examination by the courtroom. Most courts use the "Brunner Test" to decide an indebted person's qualification for understudy advance release. The key arrangements of the test are set somewhere around the United States Department of Education's, Federal Student Aid Office as given beneath:
(a) The account holder, in view of his/her present pay and costs, can't keep up a better than average "insignificant" way of life for himself/herself and his/her wards in the event that he/she were to proceed with the advance reimbursements.
(b) Additional conditions demonstrate certain the way that this condition will prevail for a larger part of the residency of the advance reimbursement.
(c) The borrower has taken a stab at reimbursing his/her understudy advance in accordance with some basic honesty up until this point.
In this specific situation, Kay would be in an ideal situation in attempting to get the advance deferred, on the off chance that she declares financial insolvency post changing her activity. This is so on the grounds that her present place of employment pays enough to reimburse her understudy advance and consequently don't meet two of the three Brunner Test models. Exchanging over to the non benefit employment would compromise her present way of life (and most likely that of her wards) and adjusts to the fundamental soul of the "Brunner Test". It would off base be upto her legitimate insight to demonstrate this danger (post work change) to her expectation for everyday comforts before the court and addition an understudy advance waiver.
Answer:
The answer is option e. $44.46
Explanation:
The stock's expected price after 5 years can be expressed as;
FV=CV(1+RRR)^n
where;
FV=future value of stock/expected price after 5 years
CV=current price of stock
DGR=dividend growth rate
n=number of years
In our case;
FV=unknown
CV=$35.25 per share
DGW=4.75%=4.75/100=0.0475
n=5 years
replacing;
FV=35.25(1+0.0475)^5
FV=35.25(1.0475)^5
FV=44.46
Corporates raise money through selling their shares. The correct answer is shares. By selling the shares, the corporates get an opportunity to grow, prosper and create economic opportunity.
<h3><u>Why do Corporates sell shares?</u></h3>
All businesses require capital to function. Selling shares in a sale of ownership can be done for a variety of reasons, including debt consolidation, funding business expansion, or risk diversification. Selling shares in a company might bring in a sizable sum of money that can be put toward debt repayment, investments, or charitable contributions. The money may also be reinvested in the company to finance growth. Similar to how selling a portion of a company can lower risk and help owners diversify their own holdings.
Other factors may also motivate business owners to sell their shares. Selling shares gradually can help you plan for eventual succession and transfer ownership in a way that will cause the eventual new owners to experience the least amount of tax shock possible. Finally, selling shares in a company can be the result of burnout or a refusal to expand the company further.
You can learn more about stocks using the below link:
brainly.com/question/24330980
#SPJ4
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Peter ($174,000 - ($66,000 ÷ 2)) $141,000
Chong ($162,000 - ($66,000 ÷ 2)) $129,000
To Cash $270,000
(Being the distribution should be recorded)
For this the capital accounts are debited as it reduced the stockholder equity and credited the cash as it also decreased the assets
Answer:
True
Explanation:
When a company successfully offers a product or few products to customers, it tends to expand the range of products it has to offer.
For a <u>company to increase its range of products successfully, it has to realize that it must make corresponding changes to its processes to accommodate the addition of new products.</u>
However <em>oftentimes, companies do not make the necessary changes to their process strategy when expanding their product offerings.</em>
