Mainly this go under the science tab. Just to let you be aware.
Anyways, you change radiant energy into thermal energy. Since the rays warm up the food, which transfer the energy to it, causing it to heat up.
Hope this helps!
~GeeksandNerds
Answer:
can we see the options ? :))
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
The tendency to overestimate the accuracy of our knowledge and judgments is called <u>Overconfidence</u>.
The overconfidence effect is a well-established bias in which subjective confidence in one's judgment is consistently greater than objective accuracy, especially when confidence is relatively high. Overconfidence is an example of subjective probability misadjustment.
Throughout the research literature, overconfidence is defined in three different ways by him. About the placement of one's performance in relation to others. Excessive accuracy in expressing undue confidence in the accuracy of one's beliefs.
The most common way to study overconfidence is to ask how confident you are about a particular belief or answer you hold. The data show that confidence systematically outweighs accuracy.
Learn more about Overconfidence here : brainly.com/question/25324915
#SPJ4
Answer:
The new United States government was thus free to acquire Native American lands by treaty or force. Resistance from the tribes stopped the encroachment of settlers, at least for a while. After the Revolutionary War, the United States maintained the British policy of treaty-making with the Native American tribes.
Explanation:
Relations between Native Americans and the United States government have been full of tension. The history began when Native Americans extended an uneasy welcome to the first European settlers. They worried that the newcomers would take their land, and many did.
Many tribes sided with the British during the Revolutionary War. After the United States won its independence, the government was free to take Native American lands. It signed treaties with the tribes to define the boundaries of tribal lands. They also stated how much the government would pay the tribes for taking their land.
