Direct variation should be called linear variation.
In this case, the answer is B.
A has the quadratic variation, C has the inverse variation, D has the cubic variation
Lets make an equation for the line first. The slope is 3 and the y intercept is -1, so we can make the equation y = 3x - 1. Then, to figure out what sign to use (<= or >= due to solid line in graph), we replace the = sign with one and see if a coordinate in the shaded area will furfill the inequality. If it doesn't, we know it needs the other inequality sign. If it does, we have found the correct inequality. So let's try y <= 3x - 1 with the coordinate (1,1). We try it, solve, and get 1 <= 2. So, the inequality for this graph is y <= 3x - 1.
Answer:
15/1 (15 Over 1)
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is x= - 11/ 16
You can check this by plugging in x for -11/16
Let x represent amount invested in the higher-yielding account.
We have been given that a man puts twice as much in the lower-yielding account because it is less risky. So amount invested in the lower-yielding account would be .
We are also told that his annual interest is $6600 dollars. We know that annual interest for one year will be principal amount times interest rate.
, where,
I = Amount of interest,
P = Principal amount,
r = Annual interest rate in decimal form,
t = Time in years.
We are told that interest rates are 6% and 10%.
Amount of interest earned from lower-yielding account: .
Amount of interest earned from higher-yielding account: .
Let us solve for x.
Therefore, the man invested $30,000 at 10%.
Amount invested in the lower-yielding account would be .
Therefore, the man invested $60,000 at 6%.