Answer:
judicial activism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this decision is an example of judicial activism. This term refers to a court ruling that is suspected of having been made on the basis of a personal opinion as opposed to an actual existing law. Such as in this case since the court made a ruling on something that is not not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
Answer:
correct option is B. Primer residue
Explanation:
correct answer is Primer residue because primer residue are form from the ignition of the chemicals in primer when the firearm is discharge
and the result in formation of microscopic particle that is blown out of various opening in weapon when this weapon is discharge
and this primer residue is deposit on hand as firing weapon and hand weapon
but in the absence of primer residue on hand it is consistent with individual not have fire
so correct option is B. Primer residue
<u>Answer:</u>
The Norman invasion in the year 1066 is considered to be very significant because it changed England in many ways. This linked England even more with the continent of Europe. It created one of the most strong monarchies in Europe and resulted in the impact and hold of Scandinavian to weaken a lot. This invasion changed the English traditions and language and there were some influence of language of France and it's culture.
Answer:
Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court using the reasonableness standard.
Explanation:
The reasonableness standard is used in US courts to understand whether a plaintiff or defendant acted reasonably in a harassment situation, for example, and it has been used in cases against police where the plaintiff claims excessive violence was used. There is also the "reasonable woman standard" that has been used in US Supreme Court Cases like Harris vs. Forklift Systems 510 US 17 (1993). The Supreme Court sided in favor of Harris who had to appeal two lower court decisions that found that Harris was not sufficiently psychologically impacted for the case to constitute harassment. The reasonableness standard can be seen as limiting because it imposes the standards of what men find reasonable in a sexual situation and coworker relationship at the expense of what women may find uncomfortable or inappropriate.
