Answer:
Here's my answer i hope this helps
Answer:
Harry was incorrect, and Samantha can be held liable for direct patent infringement
Explanation:
In the court of law it is difficult to prove that Samantha did not know that the earlier patent existed. As, far as the court knows she made a comb which was identical to the one of the patent.
She would not be able to sell the rest of her inventory she would be held guilty of infringing the patent whether she had known or not known.
So, Harry's statement was wrong.
Manhattan is sold by the Indians for $24 worth of buttons and cloth. Manhattan is sold by the Indians for $24 worth of buttons and cloth. Would you believe that a city that is one of the most densely populated places in the world was sold for some sewing materials?
In other words can live by him/her self independently idk what they are described as hmm idk say integrated
