Alfred Adler counter argue Sigmund Freud’s concept of
psychological defense mechanism by his ways of engaging the ‘striving for
superiority’ rather than focusing or engaging on Freud’s ‘sex and aggression as
a motivation’ as it counter argues the psychological defense mechanism.
Answer:
There is two recessive genes
Explanation:
If there was a dominant gene then that would over power ( so to speak) the recessive genes. If there was not any genes then there would be no way for the wings to form.
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
Answer:
C. He would support the author for suggesting that racial equality is an impossibility.
Explanation:
It is true, because age and occupation can determine how high or low of a risk they could be.
