Answer:
d. conventional
Explanation:
Kohlberg did some studies on morality and proposed a theory on moral development.
Kohlberg defined three different levels of morality (and each level consists in 2 stages). These levels are:
- preconventional,
- conventional and
- postconventional
In the preconventional level, the person's morality is externally controlled and therefore acts based on what the punishment or reward will be (1st stage) or based on how good will it be for him/her to act in some way (2nd stage)
The conventional level stages also have to to with external controls but now the person thinks in function of ensure positive relationships and societal order. The third stage here depends on the approval of others. The fourth stage has to do with accepting rules because they preserve the society order and functioning.
The postconventional level stages are defined in more abstract principles or values. The 5th stage sees the world as a place with different values that must be respected. Finally the 6th stage is based in universal ethical abstract principles.
In this example, Candice is presented with a moral dilemma, she said the person should take a course of action that will ensure that the community will not disapprove of the person's action. We can see that<u> her response has to do with external controls, specifically with the approval of the community as a whole. </u>We know that in the conventional level, the 3rd stage has to do with the approval of others. Therefore, Candice's response reflects Lawrence Kohlberg's conventional level of moral development.
I believe the answer is: polygyny
polygyny refers to a form of poligamy in which one male have more than one female partner/mates.
From all forms of poligamy, polygyny is the most common to be found in the world, especially in middle eastern countries.
<span>PROTECT THEMSELVES. Feudalism provided an early structure throughout (mainly europe) the world allowing for fealty to be pledged, taxes to be paid, and dominion to be assigned to oligarchy based royalty families. With an upward structure based on taxing, and tithing, and warring factions, feudalism allowed for the medieval empires to exist soundly.</span>
In the democracy of Athens, they pretty much voted on every single thing, so it was a democracy. But, with the Pharaoh's and Kings, there was an <em>absolute monarchy, </em>which means that that one person had all of the power. If the monarch wanted to exile someone, he could do it with nobidy bcking him up, its his decision, but if the Athens people wanted to exile somebody, they would have to have 50% +1 person vote on exile.
<span>Noreen's viewpoint that our behavior is motivated by inner forces and conflicts about which we have little awareness or control </span>is most consistent with the psychodynamic perspective in psychology. The <span>psychodynamic approach is </span>based upon the interaction of drives and forces within the person.
