1.) Bill of Rights
2.) Amendments
3.) <span>Separation of Powers</span>
4.) Veto
5.) Governor
Hope this helps,
♥<span><em>A.W.E.<u>S.W.A.N.</u></em></span>♥
The US position on French intervention in Mexico is to avoid direct conflict with France, and the US has become silent and has done no innervation in Mexican affairs, but they have also remained neutral in the conflict.
<h3>How did the US react to the French takeover of Mexico?</h3>
Maximilian and French meddling in Mexican affairs was denied by Abraham Lincoln. This, according to Lincoln, was a violation of the Monroe Doctrine, which warned European countries
The US would not tolerate further meddling in Western Hemisphere countries.
As a result, the US position on the French intervention in Mexico is to avoid a direct conflict.
For more details about the United States respond to the French takeover of Mexico, click here:
brainly.com/question/27605589
#SPJ4
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "b. unconditioned stimulus." A child's fear at the sight of a hypodermic needle is an <span>unconditioned stimulus. This is the correct answer as far as the child's fear is concerned.</span>
The term “Puritanism” was given to members of the Anglican Church of England in mid-16th century who claimed they wanted to “purify” the church. It was particularly strong in British North America. One of their strongest beliefs was that of “predestination.”
The doctrine of predestination argues that one cannot chose to be saved, nor can we achieve salvation simply by our actions. Whether we are saved or not will depend on whether God chooses to save us.
They distinguish between:
Justification: When God elects those he will grant salvation.
Sanctification: The holy behaviour that comes with being saved.
Their belief was that God had already decided whether each person was going to be saved or not, and human behaviour could do nothing to alter it.
This belief, instead of making them despair, motivated the Puritans to try to find “evidence” of whether God had elected them. This evidence came in the form of their personal behaviour. Therefore, it prevented followers from falling into despair or temptation, and instead provided them with another reason to lead a righteous life.
Answer:
c.there are no virtues common to all
Explanation:
Aristotle, a Greek philosopher says that virtue is the mean. Aristotle says that virtue is the moral character or nature of as person according to which we behave in the right manner and it is considered as the mean between the extremes of excess and the deficiency.
According to him, pleasure can not be the end product of virtue. For the Greeks, virtue is same as excellence. A virtues person behaves in a particular way and is different for different people.
Thus the answer is ---
c.there are no virtues common to all