Answer:
The correct answers is: Give firms the right to require a worker not to join a union as a condition of employment.
Explanation:
A Yellow-dog contract <u>is an illegal contract that contains employment agreements with the condition that workers could not join labor unions or if they were already in a union, they had to resign their memberships or lose their jobs.</u>
It was believed that employers and their workers should be free to negotiate labor agreements between themselves without interference from the government.
Employers challenged labor union opposition to yellow dog contracts by asserting that the agreements were negotiable and workers were not forced to sign them. According to the unions, few workers who refused to sign the anti-union employment agreements were hired.
<u>In the year 1932, the labor unions managed to get Congress to pass legislation, outlawing yellow dog contracts.</u>
In a manufacturing business or any type of business, one must start with capital that can upstart the business and then must be sustained through revenue. This is important to maintain the cycle of the business. In the manufaturing business, rhinestones is a term to describe the capital.
Answer:
D. They might order a greater number of gallons with jugs or with barrels, depending on various factors like the demand rate, ordering cost, and holding cost.
Explanation:
Let us assume the following things
D be the demand rate
P be the Unit cost
H be the holding cost per gallon per months
S be the ordering cost
Now the economic order quantity is
EOQ units = Q = √(2DS ÷ (H))
Therefore, the order quantity would be based upon demand rate, ordering cost and holding cost.
So the last option is correct
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
Answer:
No, there is no contract between the two parties because of withdrawal of offer (Revocation) before the acceptance of the other party.
Explanation:
When one party offers another party and after some time the offer maker withdraws the offer by communicating that they had revoked then the offer is no more available to the other party and is often termed as Revocation. So when the offer maker revokes before the acceptance of the offer by the other party then their is no offer at consideration to the other party, which means if there is no offer then their can not be an acceptance of an offer and of course when there is no acceptance then there is no contract.
The communication of revocation was held before the acceptance of the offer of the other party which agains says that the contract was not actually formed.
