All categories

3 years ago

List 3 similarities between a Roth IRA and a Traditional IRA

Mathematics

1 answer:

svlad2 [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Comparing Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA.

1. Taxation. The most significant and prominent difference between a Roth IRA and a Traditional IRA is when and how you get taxed.

2. Taking Distributions.

3. Early Withdrawals.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

A new school will have three playgrounds. Two playgrounds will be large and one playground will be small. The district administr

Andrews [41]

Answer:

you multiple two numbers and you devide both sides you get the answer

7 0

3 years ago

15 points !!!! Diameter Radius Area Circumference of 84mm

SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer:

$lets \: \: \: find \: \: the \: \: radius \\ = 2\pi \: r \\ = 2\pi \: r = 84 \\ = \frac{2\pi \: r}{2\pi } = \frac{84}{2\pi} \\ = r = 13.37mm$

$lets \: \: \: find \: \: the \: \: \: area \\ = \pi {r}^{2} \\ = \pi \times {13.37}^{2} \\ = 561.55 {mm}^{2}$

$lets \: \: \: find \: \: \: the \: \: diameter \\ = d = 2r \\ = d = 2 \times 13.37 \\ = d = 26.74mm$

6 0

4 years ago

The equation of a line given two points needs to be found. Samuel claims that slope-intercept form will generate the equation an

Nikitich [7]

Answer:

Helena is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope intersept form of the line is

y = m x + c

where, m is the slope and c is the intersept.

The point slope form of the equation is

$y - y'= \frac{y''-y'}{x''-x'}\times (x-x')$

So, if there are two points are given, the equation of line is found by the point slope form.

So, Helena is correct.

8 0

3 years ago

Consider the matrix <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A_%7B4x4%7D%2C%20det%28A%29%20%3D%20-2" id="TexFormula1" title="A_{4x4}, d

Lerok [7]

We found a counterexample, so the statement is false.

<h3>Is the statement true?</h3>

Let's use the matrix:

$\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right]$

This is a 4x4 matrix with determinant equal to -2.

The inverse matrix is:

$\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1/2&0&0&0\\0&-1&0&0\\0&0&-1&0\\ 0&0&0&-1 \end{array}\right]$

If we multiply it by 2, we get:

$\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&0&0&0\\0&-2&0&0\\0&0&-2&0\\ 0&0&0&-2 \end{array}\right]$

The adjoint of that is the original matrix, actually:

$\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right]$

Which we already know, has a determinant of -2.

So the statement is false, as we found a counterexample.

If you want to learn more about matrices:

brainly.com/question/11989522

#SPJ1

7 0

2 years ago

Answer question 11 and 12

Darya [45]

Answer:

11. y = -2x - 4.

12. y = x - 5

Step-by-step explanation:

11. the given points on the line are ((-2, 0) and (0, -4)

The slope of the line

= difference in y values / corresponding difference in x values

= ( - 4 - 0) / 0 - (-2))

= -4 / 2

= -2.

The general form of a straight line is y = mx + c where m = the slope and c = y value of the intercept on the y-axis.

So the equation is:

y = -2x - 4.

12.

The points are (1, -4) and (3, -2).

The slope is (-2 - (-4)) / (3 - 1)

= 2/2

= 1.

So the equation is

y = 1x + c

We find c by plugging in the point (1, -4):

-4 = 1 + c

c = -4 - 1

c = -5.

The equation is y = x - 5.

5 0

3 years ago