Answer:
Relevant; comparison
Explanation:
The comparison question test (CQT) posits that guilty individuals react more strongly to Relevant questions, whereas innocent individuals react more strongly to comparison questions.
The comparison question test (CQT) is one of the several questioning technique used in polygraph test, it designed to make comparative responses to relevant question with those of control questions i.e control for the effect of generally threatening nature of relevant question.
Making use of CQT assumes that physiological measures while lying will be greater than physiological measure while telling the truth. An innocent individual who is telling the truth react to comparison questions more than relevant question because these questions are design to arouse the subject concern about their past truthiness
Answer: The one-stop shopping these businesses provide is extraordinarily convenient, and prices are consistently low.
Explanation:
This sentence lists two advantages to shopping at national chain stores such as Walmart and Costco.
The advantages are that prices are lower and they offer convenience thereby saving people time on shopping because the wide array of goods they offer means that people can get most if not all that they need from these shops without having to hop from shop to shop to find different items.
Answer: A. Detailed forecast of demand are not needed.
Explanation: Forecasting is an essential organizational ethic used to make future predictions based on past data and trend analysis.
Detailed forecast of demand are very essential in the service sector for reasons which include; forecasting demands ensures an organization can make a good estimate of what goods or service to get ready, The required labor or materials needed for production.
Having an estimate of the service demand and labor required will minimize the tendency of overproduction leading to losses or producing lesser than the demand of clients.
Answer: A case that had to do with contract interference. Pennzoil made an unsolicited bid to buy 20 percent of Getty Oil at $112.50 per share and the Getty Board approved the agreement. Before the lawyers for both side could approve the agreement, Texaco appeared and offered Getty stockholders $128 a share for the entire company. Getty officers turned their attention to Texaco, but Pennzoil sued, claiming tortious interference. Texaco said they had not interfered because there was no binding contract.
Jury agreed with Penzoil's argument--$7.53 million in actual damages and $3 billion more in punitive damages. After appeals and frantic negotiations, the two parties reached a settlement.
Texaco agreed to pay Penzoil $3 billion as a settlement for having wrongfully interfered with Pennzoil's agreement to buy Getty.
