There is a multitude of ways in which our leaders reach us personally.
For example,
Teachers are leaders that are more specialized in helping students, and there are some, such as counselors that are even more personally.
A more general way that we are reached is through laws. We choose our laws, and they in return enforce it. Such as building roads, or helping develop towns.
Many primary sources cannot be understood because of the language or they way they have written it. We can't always understand it because its from a culture completely different from our own. Reading primary sources requires your his historical imagination.
Answer: 9.7%
Explanation: I looked at the U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population, 1850 to 2000, and the American Community Survey, 2010.
Answer:
<h2>Democracy </h2>
<h3>A democracy means rule by the people. The name is used for different forms of government, where the people can take part in the decisions that affect the way their community is run. The people elect their leaders. These leaders take this decision about laws. This is commonly called representative democracy. A democracy is the government elected by the people, from among the people themselves. The Army is integral in protecting the country, but it is not elected by the people; hence, it cannot form a democratic government. A democracy is a form of government that empowers the people to exercise political control, limits the power of the head of state, provides for the separation of powers between governmental entities, and ensures the protection of natural rights and civil liberties. In practice, democracy takes many different forms.</h3>
<h2>EXAMPLES:</h2>
<h3>1. If you are opposed to democracy, you do not believe every individual has a voice.</h3>
<h3>2.We use democracy as a method of selecting representatives.</h3>
<h3>3.In point of fact, bourgeois democracy is the political formula for free trade, nothing more.</h3>
<h3>4.The widespread belief in the robustness of the rule of law in Britain certainly reflects our</h3><h3> reputation as a vibrant multicultural democracy.</h3>
<h3>5.A nobility of this kind often gave way to a democracy which either proved as turbulent as itself, or else grew into an oligarchy ruling under democratic forms. Thus at Florence the old nobles became the opposite to a privileged class.</h3>
<h2>please give me brainliest. thank you</h2>
<span>The autocratic leadership style is more compatible with cultures where power is unequal. This style relates to a ruler who wields absolute power.</span>
