Answer:Behavioral
Explanation: Behavioral decision making style is the process in which factor of avoiding disputes with each other and working of people with harmony is considered. People who follow this type of decision making style focus on the above mentioned factors.
These people can convince others by their talking manner and also can attract other to understand their point-of-view.
According to the situation mentioned in the question, Uri persist the behavioral decision making style .He avoids disputes, have persuasive style of taking,does not want to hurt others,has warm nature as well which makes him popular among staff and customers.
Answer: Ownership and free access
Explanation: I know that answer bcz im good at that type of stuff
Explanation:
<h2><em>hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>helpful</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em> </em></h2><h2><em>keep</em><em> </em><em>smiling</em><em> </em></h2>
Answer:
dysfunction; promotes sexism
Explanation:
The answer is
dysfunction; promotes sexism
Karl Marx is known as the father of social conflict theory. According to the conflict theory, there are very limited resources and inequality in the society and people are in a state of a never ending conflict they focuses mainly on this resources in the society.
Conflict theorists claims that the society is maintain by the power and domination instead of conformity and consensus.
Social conflict theory claims that the passages given in the context is a abnormality or a dysfunction of the system called the society because it promotes the dominion of the men to the women that leads to promotes sexism when wives are asks to submit themselves to their husbands in the name of the religion.
Thus the answer is --
dysfunction; promotes sexism
Answer:
The correct option is option D
Explanation:
Based on the text, the patriot act of 2001, which expanded government surveillance measures in order to combat terrorism, is the statement the author most likely agree with.
The Patriot Act is a U.S. law enforcement to detect and deter terroris enacted shortly after 9/11 attack, this act allows the government to conduct widespread surveillance and obtain a secret court order requiring third parties, such as telephone companies, to hand over any personal information without the consent of the owner. This act violates the Fourth Amendment, which says the government cannot conduct a search without obtaining a warrant and showing probable cause to believe that the person has committed or will commit a crime.
