Answer: Start = $300 million
End = $318.59 million
Explanation:
NAV can be calculated by dividing the funds Assets net of Liabilities by the total number of outstanding shares.
At start of the year NAV is $300 million and NAV per share is therefore,
= 300 million/ 10 million
= $30 per share.
Ending NAV
During the year the fund made Investments and increased by a price of 7%
= 300 million (1 + 0.07)
= $321 million
We still have to subtract the 12b-1 fees that the fund charges though and that would result in,
= 321 million * (1 - 0.0075)
= 318.5925
= $318.59 million.
Dividing this by the total number of outstanding shares we have,
= 318.59 /10
= $31.86
$31.86 is the NAV per share at year end.
Current ratio is a comparison of current assets to current liabilities, calculated by dividing your current assets by your current liabilities.
The quick ratio compares the total amount of cash + marketable securities + accounts receivable to the amount of current liabilities.
A. Inventory would be a factor in both of these ration (assets). In both of these industries, inventory would be low. You cannot readily stockpile energy and burgers are perishable items.
B. It is true that both of these industries would have low outstanding accounts receivable because people will need their power to survive and fast food places don't offer credit.
C. These two industries deal with cash mainly. Cash doesn't have to be physical currency, but accounts that can easily be paid.
D. Low current and quick ratios are actually signs of good management not poor management.
All of the above are correct EXCEPT answer D.
Answer:
D. Material requisitions authorize the transfer of materials from the production floor to the raw materials warehouse
Explanation:
Material requisitions doesnt authorize anything, just provides information
Answer:
Explanation:
The equation to calculate the <em>monthly payment</em> for fixed-rate loans is:
![Monthly\text{ }payment=Loan\times \bigg[\dfrac{r(1+r)^t}{(1+r)^t-1}\bigg]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Monthly%5Ctext%7B%20%7Dpayment%3DLoan%5Ctimes%20%5Cbigg%5B%5Cdfrac%7Br%281%2Br%29%5Et%7D%7B%281%2Br%29%5Et-1%7D%5Cbigg%5D)
Where:
- Loan = $8500 - $300 = 8,200
- r is the monthly interest = 5.75% / 12 = 0.0575/12 ≈ 0.00479
- t is the number of moths = 36
Substituting:
![Monthly\text{ }payment=\$8,200\times \bigg[\dfrac{(0.0575/12)(1+(0.0575/12))^{36}}{(1+(0.0575/12))^{36}-1}\bigg]=\$ 248.53](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Monthly%5Ctext%7B%20%7Dpayment%3D%5C%248%2C200%5Ctimes%20%5Cbigg%5B%5Cdfrac%7B%280.0575%2F12%29%281%2B%280.0575%2F12%29%29%5E%7B36%7D%7D%7B%281%2B%280.0575%2F12%29%29%5E%7B36%7D-1%7D%5Cbigg%5D%3D%5C%24%20248.53)
Answer:
c. lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because they take the same amount of money from both poor and rich.
Explanation:
To understand this question, you have to first understand what lump-sum taxes are.
Lump-sum taxes are a system of taxes where everybody pays the same amount of tax no matter their economic status, or their actions. Basically, lump-sum taxes take the same amount of money from the rich and the poor, hugely increasing the burden on the poor and lessening that of the rich.
As an example, a lump-sum tax of $100 would require everybody to pay $100. To a person earning, say $120, that would be a huge hit, and be a huge burden on his normal life. However, to a rich person who earns, say, $10000, that would be much more easier for the rich person.
Hence, lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because of the unfair advantage the rich have over the poor in tax-paying.
Hope this helped!
