1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
3 years ago
6

What is a thesis?essay question , was America justified into starting a war with Mexico?

History
1 answer:
tiny-mole [99]3 years ago
8 0
A thesis pretty much just explains what your argument is and why. an example would be America was justified in starting a war with icu because __ and ___
You might be interested in
Which conclusion about the U.S. economy is most supported by the information on this time line?
erastovalidia [21]

Answer:

Marketplace competition drove producers to innovate and improve products.

4 0
3 years ago
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
There was fighting between the British and Americans before there was an official Declaration of Independence. True False
Andrej [43]
Yes, there was. The fighting lead to the Declaration of Independence. Since the British Empire wanted to pretty much use the America’s. I’m other words True.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did so many americans learn about the events in boston so quickly?
seraphim [82]

Answer:

Many Americans learn about Boston, as it concerned with the dealing of the colonists and the British.

Explanation:

Boston harbour was the main port for exporting and importing goods and was an essential maritime shipping centre. Having control of Boston was an advantage for the British as they exercise the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts. Boston Massacre occurred in Boston in 1770, when the colonists began to throw stone, sticks, and snowball at the British troops who posted in the city. The view soon became disordered, and the British guards fired shots into the crowd and killing five civilians.

The Boston Massacre encouraged the people to unite and a call for patriotism in the colonies.

7 0
3 years ago
The purpose of the British Declaratory Act of 1766 was to
erik [133]
One of the main purposes of the British Declaratory Act of 1766 was to end the boycotts that were taking place in America over British goods, due to what the colonists saw as unfair taxation. 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best describes the Albany Plan of Union?
    11·2 answers
  • in Western European nations, many of the evils associated with the factory system have been corrected by
    6·1 answer
  • Please help with this for 30 points
    10·2 answers
  • Due to decades of colonization and their recent independence, which region has had a difficult time establishing stable democrac
    8·1 answer
  • Checks are not considered legal tender.<br><br> False<br> True
    6·1 answer
  • What changes to national borders were brought about by the Treaty of<br> Versailles?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statements about Saddam Hussein are accurate? Check all that apply. He was a dictator. He was president of Iran. He was ov
    10·2 answers
  • Pls answer all :( I have a lot of stuff
    5·2 answers
  • "Evaluate the way in which non-Western nations responded to the advances in Western Europe? "
    9·1 answer
  • What was Germany's reaction to the Treaty of Paris (explain two reactions that led to WWII)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!