Answer:
Loss on putting for long time = $300 (Loss
)
Explanation:
Given:
Strike price = $120
Stock price = $123
Premium amount = $3 per share
Realize on investment = ?
Computation of realizing on investment:
Given that strike price is lower than the stock price, So premium paid considers as a loss.
Loss on putting for long time = $3 × 100
Loss on putting for long time = $300 (Loss
)
Answer: detail oriented
Explanation:
From the analysis made in the question, we can deduce that Apple probably looks to hire people who are innovative and detail-oriented.
A detail oriented person pays attention to every little details and tries as much as possible to avoid mistakes and is very close to being described as a perfectionist.
Answer:
Revealed by
Explanation:
The revealed by is the concept that is applied in the case when the classification of the derivatives for the new document is inbuilt and get the authorized source for classification into a new document plus the same is to not seen in the source document
Therefore the concept i.e used to determine the classification of derivatives is revealed by concept
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
