Answer:
Note: The correct option is a. Increase Net Cash from operations.
Explanation:
Note: This question is not complete as the options are omitted. The options are therefore provided to complete the question before answering the question as follows:
a. Increase Net Cash from operations
b. Decrease Net Cash from operations on the Cash Flow Statement
c. No impact on Net Cash from operations
d. Just impact the Balance Sheet
The explanation of the answers is now provided as follows:
Since the assets was purchased early in the year, depreciation will be charged on it in the income statement for the year at the end of the year. Since depreciation is a non-cash item, it will added back to the net income in the indirect Cash Flow Statement method as one of the adjustments to the net income under the Cash from operations. This adding back of the depreciation will therefore lead to an Increase Net Cash from operations.
Therefore, the correct option is a. Increase Net Cash from operations.
Answer:
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 5 kg of steak.
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.2 kg of potatoes.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 3 kg of steak.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.33 kg of potatoes.
Casey should produce steak while Rick should produce potatoes, since Rick has a comparative advantage in producing potatoes (lower opportunity cost) and Casey has a comparative advantage in producing steak.
As long as the price of steak per kilogram of potatoes is less than 5 kg of steak and more than 3 kg of steak, then both would win. In order for both of them to win is a similarly proportional way, the exchange price should be 4 kg of steak per kg of potatoes.
The correct answer is - E<span>nglish is now the second language of at least one-sixth of the nations restaurant workers, and about one-third of that group speaks no English at all.
Logos is a rhetorical appeal that authors use in order to persuade people to believe them. Logos is based on logic, on facts, or proof, and there is proof to support this claim about English, whereas the other sentences aren't really there to prove anything.
</span>
I bought an apartment with my boyfriend last year because we had been dating for 4 years and he proposed. In order to prepare, we saved up our money, asked the bank for their opinion on the best coarse of action financially, and we tried to decide how much of our savings we should use without being irresponsible. (This is just an example. I am 15 and will be forever alone but yea this is what I would do anyways)
