Answer:
B. Jews were allowed to practice their religion in Islamic Spain.
Explanation:
Answer:
In my opinion sectionalism was a big part of the civil war because, the citizen of each area did not want to see their state fall so, many people fought for their state and they just ended up on one side while the others ended up on the other side and it was not just slavery but slavery was the last push that started the civil war. Also it was from all the propaganda that was going around spreading influence to people that also started the civil war. Next, the different economic life of the south and north led to the civil war, the cultural difference between north and south did not help the cause. While north had jobs for everyone with manufacturing while there was not as many jobs in the south from slavery and they did not have as many as factories, the south hated the north and could not take it anymore from all the farming and low quality items they had in the south while the north had all this jewelry and factories to make high quality goods. Finally: In the end north and south started a civil war because of “slavery” they say but there were many problems between the two even before slavery so it was unavoidable. When the north won they abolished slavery they set up more factories and they started flourishing in money and goods.
Explanation:
Menachem Begin
Margaret Thatcher
Indir Gandhi
Manuel Noriega
Answer:
answer below!
Explanation: The 40 Principal Doctrines of the Epicureans taught that "in order to obtain protection from other men, any means for attaining this end is a natural good" (PD 6). They believed in a contractarian ethics where mortals agree to not harm or be harmed, and the rules that govern their agreements are not absolute (PD 33), but must change with circumstances (PD 37-38). The Epicurean doctrines imply that humans in their natural state enjoy personal sovereignty and that they must consent to the laws that govern them, and that this consent (and the laws) can be revisited periodically when circumstances change.[11]
The Stoics held that no one was a slave by nature; slavery was an external condition juxtaposed to the internal freedom of the soul (sui juris). Seneca the Younger wrote:
It is a mistake to imagine that slavery pervades a man's whole being; the better part of him is exempt from it: the body indeed is subjected and in the power of a master, but the mind is independent, and indeed is so free and wild, that it cannot be restrained even by this prison of the body, wherein it is confined.[12]
Of fundamental importance to the development of the idea of natural rights was the emergence of the idea of natural human equality. As the historian A.J. Carlyle notes: "There is no change in political theory so startling in its completeness as the change from the theory of Aristotle to the later philosophical view represented by Cicero and Seneca.... We think that this cannot be better exemplified than with regard to the theory of the equality of human nature."[13] Charles H. McIlwain likewise observes that "the idea of the equality of men is the profoundest contribution of the Stoics to political thought" and that "its greatest influence is in the changed conception of law that in part resulted from it."[14] Cicero argues in De Legibus that "we are born for Justice, and that right is based, not upon opinions, but upon Nature.