1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
3 years ago
10

Did the Tea Act lead to the American Revolution? If yes, explain why.

Social Studies
2 answers:
sasho [114]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:The Intolerable Acts were a series of laws passed by the British Parliament in the mid-1770s. The British instated the acts to make an example of the colonies after the Boston Tea Party, and the outrage they caused became the major push that led to the outbreak American Revolution in 1775.

Explanation:

The Tea Act, passed by Parliament on May 10, 1773, granted the British East India Company Tea a monopoly on tea sales in the American colonies. ... The policy ignited a “powder keg” of opposition and resentment among American colonists and was the catalyst of the Boston Tea Party.

Softa [21]3 years ago
6 0
The Tea Act of 1773 was one of several measures imposed on the American colonists by the heavily indebted British government in the decade leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1775-83).
You might be interested in
When deciding whether or not to accept a special order, a decision-maker should focus on differential costs instead of full cost
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

You made two different orders for a particular item and there is a difference between them, a decision maker will want to see the difference between the two orders and in most cases choose the order with the cheaper price by looking at the differential cost than the full cost, I.e trying to see the difference between the two orders or cost and to decide which one is cheaper. So it is true a decision maker will look at the difference between the two cost not the full cost of the orders.

3 0
3 years ago
Some states conduct elections by allowing vote-by-mail.
djverab [1.8K]
Yes, but typically only for absentee voters
3 0
3 years ago
What was the book that blamed Jews for Germany’s troubles ?
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

5

During World War I, almost 100,000 German Jews proudly served in military uniform as soldiers, sailors, airmen and administrators. But far from a better public opinion of Germany’s Jewish citizens, after Germany’s crushing loss there was instead a subsequent rise in anti-Semitic narratives.

Among the common myths circulated at the time were assertions — based on real-life examples — that Jews were war profiteering at home. On top of that, it was rumored that Jews were “war shirking” — a term used to describe avoiding military responsibilities at the front lines.

The potent mix of prejudices and stereotypes quickly led a battered post-WWI German people to pin all their troubles on a ready-made scapegoat: the Jews.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFREE SIGN UP

“If we want to clearly understand how the Nazis came to power, we need to see it was the events of WWI that were fundamental to their rise,” says British historian Tim Grady, whose latest book is “A Deadly Legacy: German Jews and the Great War.”

Tim Grady, author of ‘A Deadly Legacy: German Jews and the Great War.’ (Courtesy)

“The legacies that come out of WWI — such as total war and a culture of destruction — are extremely important,” says Grady. “These remain after 1919, into the Weimar Republic, which never really becomes a proper postwar society. And so the Nazis build and develop out of this defeat and legacy.”

Therefore, while the wartime experience of German Jews “was almost the same as other Germans,” says Grady, the instability and chaos that resulted from some prominent Jews’ legacies were eventually exploited by the National Socialists as the party made its bid for power.

Through the figure of Adolf Hitler, the Nazi party became what Grady calls “the personification of WWI.”

“They are the party that will avenge Germany’s defeat,” says Grady, “and part of their legacy of WWI involves targeting Jews.”

Adolf Hitler, far right, with his war comrades of the Bavarian Reserve Infantry 16th Regiment, in 1914. (Bundesarchiv bild)

WWI, when Jews were leaders in German society

Grady believes there is an understandable inclination to approach the history of Jewish life in Germany from the perspective of what he calls a “vanishing point” — whether it’s 1933, 1938 or 1941. However, the historian says it’s important to trace the WWI culture that Jews, as well as other Germans, helped to define.

One crucial step toward scapegoating the Jews is the “stab in the back” myth, which originated in 1917 in the wake of German parliament’s peace resolution that sought to quickly end WWI. Major-General Hans von Seeckt complained that the “home [front] has stabbed [Germany] in the back.”

“For the Nazis, the ‘stab-in-the-back theory’ is the crucial legacy of WWI,” says Grady.

The myth really began to gain momentum, however, when Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff testified to the National Assembly in the new Weimar Republic in 1919.

“They suggest that someone has stabbed Germany in the back,” the historian explains. “And while they don’t identify anybody in particular, they certainly hint that some Jews could have been responsible for this.”

General Paul von Hindenburg, Kaiser Wilhelm II, and General Erich Ludendorff in German headquarters, January 1917. (Public domain)

This mythology gained even more traction in the Weimar Republic throughout the 1920s. Grady’s book recalls how in April 1924 an infamous image appeared on the cover of the front page of a German magazine called Süddeutsche Monatshefte, which had a Jewish editor, Paul Nikolaus Cossmann.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Definitions of - <br> Diversity : <br> Equality: <br> Inclusion : <br> Discrimination:
Serggg [28]

Answer:

Diversity: When many different ideas/opinions/races/religions etc. are present.

Equality: The right of different groups of people to have the same rights and be treated the same.

Inclusion: The act of including something as a part of skmething else. Also the idea that everyone should be able to use the same facilities and enjoy the same experiences, no matter race/religion/disability or other minority.

Discrimination: Purposefully treating a group of people differently (and worse) because of their race/sexual identity/sexuality/religion etc.

8 0
3 years ago
When a plant dies, sometimes the remains can be preserved in ________.
salantis [7]

Answer:a vase

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Professor skyler studies personality disorders and is most interested in people who are self-focused and exaggerate their own im
    9·1 answer
  • Which countries would most likely use m-time?
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Civil war AIDS and famine in Africa have lead to a
    13·1 answer
  • Conscientiousness is a human trait that internalizes. true or false
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a Constitutional check and balance on the power 4 points
    9·1 answer
  • The right to have a jury trial and to serve on a jury for a trial is a way to protect citizens from the overreaching by the gove
    5·1 answer
  • According to this map which product would you have been most likely to find in the Pacific Northwest
    11·1 answer
  • The drew many businesses and workers to its warm climate and low tax rates
    10·1 answer
  • HELPPPPP How did Song rulers prevent the military from becoming too strong?
    8·1 answer
  • Why do football players wear tape on the back of their arms?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!