Yes the church believes two incorrect things
1.) The earth didn’t move
2.) The earth was the centre of the universe
Whereas Galileo argued that the earth orbited the sun and the moon.
Therefore they did disagree on the whole concept of the moon and due to this the church summoned him to court.
Pls give me a brainliest if this helped thx
Rome was initially a city-state with about 50 square miles of territory to sustain itself. With small farms, the citizens could not split them up between their sons and so sought extra land for them. The surrounding city-states were bent on the same need, so they clashed, with Romme losing some, but on average winning most fights. As winners they took land and expanded.
<span>This expansion created more strife, and expansion, leading to dominance of Italy. As a rising power, cities in southern Gaul (France), Spain and Sicily sought Rome's assistance, and as a land power it allied itself with Carthage, a sea power. This arrangement came to an end when Rome supported Greek cities in Sicily against Carthaginian encroachment. A win in the First Punic (Carthaginian) War put the Romans on the path to empire, which was consilidated with the extirmination of Carthage in the Third Punic War in 146 BCE. At this stage Rome dominated the Western Mediterranean. </span>
Answer:
Price and quantity supplied
Explanation:
The supply curve is a graphic representation of the relationship between the cost of a good and the quantity supplied of this good for a particular time period. Therefore, two factors that are displayed in the supply curve are the price and quantity supplied. The supply curve changes when these factors change too. Normally, as the price of a commodity increases, the quantity supplied increases too (all else being equal). However, changes in production can cause the curve to move left and right. Similarly, changes in price can cause the graph to shift as well.
C. Because Literal means the exact thing, meaning that they are trying to describe it as best as the can to the literal way
Answer:
The government should not be permitted to tax its citizens unless they are represented in it.
Explanation:
<u>“No taxation without representation”</u> was the motto of American colonists expressing objection to the British government. It suggested the inevitable American revolution.
<u>American colonists had no say in the English government but were somehow still expected to pay taxes.</u> They demanded their legal right to be represented in the government they gave their money to, otherwise they would refuse to be taxed.
