1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina [24]
3 years ago
6

ESSAY: FOREIGN POLICY Choose one of the following topics and write a 750 word essay. a. Washington and Monroe believed the Unite

d States should not become involved in European affairs. Is it possible to follow the same policy today? Why or why not? Cite examples of recent news events to support your opinion. b. The Monroe Doctrine expressed the idea that new countries should be allowed to develop without interference from stronger nations. In your opinion, does the United States still follow this policy? Do you think that such a policy should be followed in the modern world? Cite news events and recent historical incidents to support your opinion.
History
2 answers:
maksim [4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Washington & Monroe trusted that the US should not get participated in European affairs because America is weak to wage war. Some recent consequences have involved wars in Iraq, Vietnam in this common area.  

Monroe doctrine says that the continents of North and South America must evolve without European intervention. This prevented people from a European country from controlling/colonizing property in America. In fact, they were said to be our continents for the police and not for the colonization or conquest of Europe.  

In my opinion, the United States is not following this doctrine today. 1947 Truman's doctrine changed the American approach to this subject. And, states that America supports free countries and tries to oppose oppression.

7nadin3 [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Topic chosen: A: Washington and Monroe believed...

In general terms it can be said that the belief both expressed by George Washington, and much later James Monroe in his Monroe Doctrine, was pretty much correct in the sense that no nation should have the right to either influence, and much less pressure, another into doing, or adapting, to the principles and customs that the more powerful nation intends to force, through intervention. In today´s world, 21st century, the entire world has seen that this influence and this involvement can cause more harm, and actually produce the opposite effect, from what it was intended at first. An example of that can be seen with the interventions of the U.S in such nations as those in Latin America, or in the Middle East.

However, we must also come to another point here and that is, that the influence the United States exerted on the European front, especially during the two world wars became essential, and crucial, to the desintegration of the conflict, the prevention of further deaths and destruction. And it also prevented an even worse conflict from arising as, after the Second World War ended, the Soviet Union pretended to extend its Communist ideals by force throughout the Old Continent.

Never more than during the First, Second and Cold Wars was the intervention of the U.S more effective, efficient and necessary. However, there came a point where, empowered by the success of interventionism, the United States began to lose its boundaries and forgot that its role was not to dominate other nations, but rather to extend help as a response to its being one of the most powerful and rich nations in the world. The abuse of this power, and this responsibility today, has led to conflict between the nation and other nations, including those in Europe. Today, more than even, Europe does not need the influence or intervention of the United States, they themselves being powers in their own rights. The United States´ continued attempts at forcing issues of their interest on others has been, instead of helping, causing division and a growth of dislike and even hatred towards the country.

So in conclusion, although initially the ideas of Washington and Monroe were on point, there came a time in history during the twentieth century in which the United States´ intervention in international affairs did make a difference and was necessary to restore peace. A giant like the U.S could not simply stay impavid to the struggles of Europe and the threat Nazism brought. However, that power of intervention should have been curtailed afterwards, as Europe, in its own right, is a power and does not require other nations to influence them, or intervene in their affairs.

You might be interested in
Mention some characteristics of a slave
Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

fuerte

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Plzz help
ratelena [41]
I think I wouldn't have been attracted because I probably would already have had my business settled and been making my profits. Whereas if I had gone to the west then I would have had to start over. I think the majority of people who went to the west were people who were money seekers and who were looking to better their lives.
4 0
2 years ago
“My own sex, I hope, will excuse me, if I treat them like rational creatures, instead of flattering their fascinating graces, an
Fed [463]
She is arginine for her sexual group
8 0
2 years ago
What was one economic effect of the Spanish-American War?
Leokris [45]

Answer:

A-The United States gained direct access to additional natural resources and overseas markets.

Explanation:

The Spanish-American War was a conflict that occurred between Spain and the United States of America from the 21st of April, 1898 to the 13th of August, 1898. The conflict started in Cuba as a result of the internal explosion of U.S.S Maine (Navy ship) located at the Havana Harbor. Consequently, the United States of America intervened in support of Cuba during their war for independence. USA was victorious and consequently took possession of Spanish Philippines and Guam.

One economic effect of the Spanish-American War was that, the United States gained direct access to additional natural resources and overseas markets.

8 0
3 years ago
In addition to Spain and the United States, which nation controlled the Philippines for a time?
777dan777 [17]
Japan is the correct answer, glad to help
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Can you help me with this?
    8·1 answer
  • Did franklin really collect electric fire from the sky by neve reed
    13·1 answer
  • Which chatracter(s) shows external character development?
    10·1 answer
  • 22. Adolf Hitler's aims included
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the holocaust
    13·2 answers
  • Mark the statement if it correctly describes the Mongol conquest of Russia.
    15·2 answers
  • What strategy did hitler used to conquer poland
    13·2 answers
  • Which was a result of the Egyptian building the Suez Canal?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the feudal system hinder the growth of New France?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Pilgrims recover after their first hard winter in<br> Massachusetts?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!