Answer: The saving rate is 0.30
Explanation:
The Golden Rule savings rate is referred to as the rate of savings which maximizes steady state level or growth of consumption.
Let k be the capital/labour ratio (i.e., capital per capita), y be the resulting per capita output ( y = f(k) ), and s be the savings rate. The steady state is referred to as a situation in which per capita output is unchanging, which implies that k be constant. This requires that the amount of saved output be exactly what is needed to one quip any additional workers and two replace any worn out capital.
In a steady state, therefore: sf(k)=(n+d)k
Growth rate of output =3%
Depreciation rate= 4%
Capital output ratio is (K/Y)
= 2.5
Begin the steady state condition:
S= ( σ + n + g) (k/Y)
S= (0.03+0.04) (2.5)
S= 0.175
Golden rule steady state
MPK= (0.03+0.04)= 0.07
Capital output ratio=
K/Y= Capital share / MPK
K/Y= 0.3/0.07
K/Y= 4.29
In the golden state, the capital output ratio is equal to 4.29 in comparison to the current capital ratio 2.5.
The saving rate consistent with the steady growth rate
S= ( σ + n + g) (k/Y)
S= (0.03 +0.04) (4.29)
S= 0.30
The saving rate that is consistent with the steady growth rate is 0.30
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Efficiency is manifested in the proper use of time, and resources for an intended purpose. Meaning, it is doing things right.
Production efficiency is based on a business's ability to produce the highest number of units of a good while using the least amount of resources possible.
Also, is the comparison of what is actually produced or performed with what can be achieved with the same consumption of resources (money, time, labor, etc.).
In this example, the firm has already meet the efficient point. It is not possible to produce the same level of production with less resources.
Answer:
Ten pounds of chicken to trade for at least <u>40</u> pounds of vegetables but not more than<u> 50</u> pounds of vegetables
Explanation:
Vegetables Chicken Trade Off Ratio
John 40 10 4:1 (40/10) or 1:0.25 (10/40)
George 25 5 5:1 (25/5) or 1:0.20 (5/25)
John has comparative advantage in Chicken and George has comparative advantage in Veggies because :
- John's chicken opportunity cost, in veggies < George (4<5). George's veggies opportunity cost, in chicken < John (0.20<0.25).
- George is more (5X) productive in veggies than chicken, than John (4X). John is less unproductive in chicken than veggies (1/4th), compared to George (1/5th).
So, John will sell Chicken to George & George will sell veggies to John. Gains from trade are when each get trade ratio better than their their own trade off ratio.
- It implies: John gets >' 4 pounds veggies per chicken pound' and George gets > '0.20 pound chicken per veggie pound'.
- Unitary method:- '1chicken : 4veggies' = '10chickens : 40veggies' and '0.20chicken : 1veggie' = '10chickens : 50 veggies' .
but why not save your points for when you have a question?
Answer: by instructing his teams to create mission statements with clearly defined goals
Explanation:
These are the options:
A. by dismantling the teams so he can make one goal for the entire facility
B. by instructing his teams to create mission statements with clearly defined goals
C. by making all employees trade jobs for several weeks so they have more in common
D. by increasing the dependence of the teams on each other so all tasks share common goals
E. by giving each worker a set amount of time to find out what their goals should be or face discipline
From the question, we will realize that Donovan learned that just few of the workers in the company share any sense of common goals within teams as there was He notes disparity in what the workers were doing and the goals to be accomplished.
Based on the above scenario, he should instruct his team to create mission statement that has clearly defined goals. The mission statement will show the reason for the existence of the organization, the goal of the organization, the kind of product or service rendered etc. This will help the workers know what is expected from all of them and work towards it.
