Answer:
1.25
Explanation:
The Capital Asset Pricing model will be used
ße = ßa × [Ve + Vd(1 – T)] / Ve
Here
ße = 1.08
Ve = Value of equity $50 million
Vd = Value of debt $10 million
T is tax rate which is 21%.
By putting the values, we have:
ße = 1.08 × [50 + 10(1 – 21%)] / 50
ße = 1.25
The beta equity of Chocolate Cookie is 1.25 which shows higher risk than average risk.
Answer:
$39,220
Explanation:
The maturity value of the note receivable on June 30, 2012
= Principal + Interest
= $40,000 + $40,000 x 6%
= $40,000 + $2,400
= $ 42,400
The note is discounted on September 30, 2011. Time period remaining to go till maturity as on September 30, 2011
= 12 - 3 months ( July, Aug and Sep)
= 9 months.
Amount of deduction
= $ 42,400 x 10% x 9/12
= $ 3,180
Finally, the Cash received by Ireland will be
= Maturity value - Discount
= $42,400 - $ 3,180
= $39,220
Answer:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Raking 2% interest rate:
1) 10 years
2) 5 years
3) 1 year
Raking 18% interest rate:
1) 1 year
2) 5 years
3) 10 years
Explanation:
You have to apply to bring the amount of money to present value, according with the information, the formula is the next:
Present Value = Future Value/((1+ interest rate)^(n))
Where n is the number of years that you have to wait to receive the money.
You have to calculate every situation with the respective amount of time and interest rate, the result must be money. and when you get the 9 results, you have to compare every situation and chose the higher amount of money according to the interest rate, for example:
Present value = 140/ ((1+10%)^(1))= 127
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 149
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 135
So the answer for the first scenario with an interest rate of 10% is:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Answer:
Refrain from introducing evidence of prior oral agreements that occurred before or while the agreement was being reduced to its final form in order to alter the terms of the existing contract and you will have no disputes.
Cheers!
Answer:
a. The effect of the tea shipment from India:
Imports:
Direction of change? (increase, decrease, no change)
Magnitude of change = $1,500,000
b. Because of the identity equation that relates to net exports, the (increase/decrease?) in U.S. net exports is matched by (an increase/a decrease?) in U.S. net capital outflow.
c. Examples of how the United States might be affected in this scenario:
The Indian tea producer purchases $1,500,000 worth of stock spread out over a few U.S. companies.
The Indian tea producer hangs on to the $1,500,000 so that it can use the U.S. dollars to make investments.
Explanation:
The net exports identity equation "Net Capital Outflow = Net Exports" measures the imbalance between a country's exports and imports. It also measures the imbalance between the foreign assets bought by domestic residents and the domestic assets bought by non-resident foreigners.
