Answer:
I think I would prefer a poor genuinely democratic country. I am not very impressed by great material wealth, so that is not going to persuade me to keep my mouth shut. Just think of living in Singapore, I would hate it.
Also It depends on how poor, but I think on the whole poor in a democratic country is better. Lots of rich people, I believe, buying property in other countries because they don't trust their government not to take their money and/or put them in jail. That's the disadvantage of non-democratic governments, they can be extremely arbitrary and you don't get much in the way of appeal from them.
Hope this helped?
~Heaven~
A government that subordinates the individual to the state and strictly controls all aspects of life by coercive measures
Being a soldier in colonial India in the mid-1800s one would have fought in the India rebellion of 1857 also known as the Indian Mutiny. This became a turning point in the history of India and Britain when <em>Sepoys</em> rose up against the British in <em>Meerut</em> which resulted in the massacre of all British soldiers in Delhi. These conflicts were bloody which resulted in the British dispatching more soldiers to India to end the Mutiny through merciless tactics to restore order. <em>Sepoys</em> who had surrendered were executed by British soldiers. Previously, Indians were known to be deeply conservative in their traditions and ways of life which had been disregarded by the British. Indians had been offended by reforms, new technology, new laws, and even Christianity which had been forced upon them thus resulted in resistance with violence towards the British.
Answer:
no u are not u need to add soemthing with it
Explanation:
Answer:
b
Explanation:
it provided cheap labor helping united states industries grow.