Answer:
a) 0.6212 = 62.12% probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
b) 0.7416 = 74.16% probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
c) 0.8804 = 88.04% probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
d) None of them ensure, that one which comes closer is a sample size of 100 in option c), to guarantee, we need to keep increasing the sample size.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.
Normal Probability Distribution
Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean
and standard deviation
, the z-score of a measure X is given by:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e227e/e227e1fd8c5f5aa061eb96190d86490fd0f44b57" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}"
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
Central Limit Theorem
The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean
and standard deviation
, the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean
and standard deviation
.
For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.
The CPA Practice Advisor reports that the mean preparation fee for 2017 federal income tax returns was $273. Use this price as the population mean and assume the population standard deviation of preparation fees is $100.
This means that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6824/d6824f616fab05e3c7d2366c45ee2d9218e70295" alt="\mu = 273, \sigma = 100"
A) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?
Sample of 30 means that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f096/8f096e0789bbe807c3bddd0827d5f28c69d57e8a" alt="n = 30, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}"
The probability is the p-value of Z when X = 273 + 16 = 289 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 273 - 16 = 257. So
X = 289
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e227e/e227e1fd8c5f5aa061eb96190d86490fd0f44b57" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}"
By the Central Limit Theorem
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9115/b91152accc59fc612411834b58307804e3d6d2ec" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba211/ba21165794faf4496dd61b9194f3a2b3bec8f7af" alt="Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72df6/72df6f3b2ae43592685b44dac4d32cf3353e9602" alt="Z = 0.88"
has a p-value of 0.8106
X = 257
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9115/b91152accc59fc612411834b58307804e3d6d2ec" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/146c1/146c1a8022c261ee4e0e2da4c538f582665276fa" alt="Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6246/d62469344f6ec28a71dca4658eeb3eda0ca63f40" alt="Z = -0.88"
has a p-value of 0.1894
0.8106 - 0.1894 = 0.6212
0.6212 = 62.12% probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
B) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?
Sample of 30 means that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e37e6/e37e65b5facaddd4f266c5d10eda3268a567e565" alt="n = 50, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}"
X = 289
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e227e/e227e1fd8c5f5aa061eb96190d86490fd0f44b57" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}"
By the Central Limit Theorem
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9115/b91152accc59fc612411834b58307804e3d6d2ec" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fb77/9fb77af2cbcde408cc638ed8de6bb25b99a18545" alt="Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38b79/38b79b7627660fc64d4f6d89b70fbae8fe601da7" alt="Z = 1.13"
has a p-value of 0.8708
X = 257
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9115/b91152accc59fc612411834b58307804e3d6d2ec" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23033/230336d065b2edf4c8d491441fe82236041b5022" alt="Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35dfb/35dfbe713389763b7da8505218d448c9ca751053" alt="Z = -1.13"
has a p-value of 0.1292
0.8708 - 0.1292 = 0.7416
0.7416 = 74.16% probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
C) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?
Sample of 30 means that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31c37/31c37d85a763064ec5b03bc3e7f9d04f9bc3fd2c" alt="n = 100, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}"
X = 289
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e227e/e227e1fd8c5f5aa061eb96190d86490fd0f44b57" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}"
By the Central Limit Theorem
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9115/b91152accc59fc612411834b58307804e3d6d2ec" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9c24/d9c24440df365910b00253f9acb1e40fb5db9b5e" alt="Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a08/82a083a5a89178632aec69941d425f58ee7b2d85" alt="Z = 1.6"
has a p-value of 0.9452
X = 257
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9115/b91152accc59fc612411834b58307804e3d6d2ec" alt="Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a282c/a282c5766c09799b0e5558a47a3141a6061ae90e" alt="Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9155/e91551f0fbc18b4e5239589403bfaa7f933f7c35" alt="Z = -1.6"
has a p-value of 0.0648
0.9452 - 0.0648 =
0.8804 = 88.04% probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
D) Which, if any of the sample sizes in part (a), (b), and (c) would you recommend to ensure at least a .95 probability that the same mean is withing $16 of the population mean?
None of them ensure, that one which comes closer is a sample size of 100 in option c), to guarantee, we need to keep increasing the sample size.