In the issue of this magazine the people that the ad is most likely targeting would be the baby boomers.
<h3>Who are the baby boomers?</h3>
This is the name that was used to refer to the people that were born at the period that the second word war ended and towards the 1960s. These were the people that were in the United States between the years of mid-1946 and mid-1964,
Hence we can conclude by saying that In the issue of this magazine the people that the ad is most likely targeting would be the baby boomers.
Read more on baby boomers here
brainly.com/question/5111407
#SPJ1
Answer: Occurs only during a recession.
Explanation:
Cycling unemployment is a kind of unemployment where company lay-off workers because they can't meet up with their payments: as a result of a general drop in the demand for goods and services in the economy of country.
Cyclical unemployment are very common in recessions as companies then massively drop workers in their establishment due to general low economic activities.
Government to invest in technology and education, and to provide goods and services for the benefit of the American people. The government affect the business cycle Use of fiscal policy increased government spending and/or tax cuts is the most common way of boosting aggregate demand, causing an economic expansion.
Noland's problem was most likely due to PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE.
Proactive interference refers to the tendency of previously learned material to hinder subsequent learning. Proactive interference mostly occur when two information that are similar in format are involved.<span />
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
