Answer:
Second option
Third option
Fourth option
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the following quadratic function
Use the distributive property to multiply the expression
For a function of the form 
the x coordinate of the vertex is:
Then in this case the coordinate of the vertex is:
To obtain the y coordinate of the vertex we evaluate the function at 
Then the vertex is: (-3, -16)
We can see in the graph that the zeros of the function are x=1 and x=-7
Then the function is decreasing from -∞ to -3 and then it is increasing from -3 to ∞
The function is positive for 
and 
The correct answers are:
Second option
Third option
Fourth option
To find this value, simply substitute the number 10 in for x in your equation:
The answer is 98.
Answer:
![r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%5Cfrac%7Bn%28%5Csum%20xy%29-%28%5Csum%20x%29%28%5Csum%20y%29%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5Bn%5Csum%20x%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20x%29%5E2%5D%5Bn%5Csum%20y%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20y%29%5E2%5D%7D%7D)
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:
And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
And the model obtained for this case is:
The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:
And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Answer:
72 +1 , If u = A 8 1 - 2 ( ( + + +1 )– flog ( 3 + 3 / 3 ) ? v1m * + n + 13 ) 4 1 ; then 2 If c ... of any number of such MATHEMATICS . triangles ; and ( 3 ) find the mean value of ... 72 = 62 + 69 , 73 = 82 + 39 , 75 = 72 + 52 . the in - centre and centroid . ... 4n + 1 , or 4n + 2 ,
Step-by-step explanation:
