We can see from Dr. Aguilera's findings that high levels of anxiety are associated with poor academic performance. However, the number of hours of sleep has little bearing on how well or poorly a student does in class.
The confounding variable is important to avoid obstacles to the measurement
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Dr. Aguilera discovered a strong link between anxiety and academic achievement. Additionally, this number is negative, indicating a negative correlation between the two variables. According to this negative correlation, the value of the other variable decreases as the value of the first variable increases. Therefore, academic performance declines when anxiety levels rise.
The term "correlation" describes the connection between two variables. In other words, if the correction equals 0, there is no correlation between the two variables. The relationship between sleep duration and academic performance was zero. This indicates that these factors are unrelated and have no bearing on one another.
The Cohort effect is crucial to avoid obstacles to the measurement and research methodologies used, nevertheless.
Learn more about research on:
brainly.com/question/13347943
#SPJ1
Answer:
C
Explanation:
effects on animal moments, because the turbines make noise under the water scaring the animals and in some cases chaining migration patterns.
Hope this helps!
'Horse Drawn Vehicles' were once the primary transportation method, and there were 3 involved animals, horses, mules, and oxen, although horses were the original go to for a carriage, due to fast movement, oxen soon became popular amoungst emigrants.
1 and 3 are correct, this is due to the fact that modern technology is constantly growing and other developed nations are feeling threatened or inferior when another developed nation grows further ahead. National security has also grown global, just the threat of a foreign country developing nuclear capability is enough for another country to launch missle strikes or other acts in order to quell the threat of another nuclear capable country. 2 is not correct because industrial strategies are being shared throughout the world constantly and the safety of a country no longer stands by their standing army or navy, but by the threat of nuclear capability or a possibility of retaliation through explosive nature. Even today, most wars are done through the army holding down a line, and the navy/airforce launching long ranged missile attacks of various nature.
Tree thinning I'm guessing. I had just learned this recently but I could always possibly be wrong.
