Similar
biblical society
born in blood
abrogated founding deal
capitalistic
nation of immigrants
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Firstly, heavier NATO involvement in Crimea would escalate the current crisis. Shifting the focus of the confrontation from Ukraine-Russia to US-Russia would tie Putin’s hands, and virtually disable him from backing down. The strong support he received from Russia’s Parliament, along with the approval for use of the armed forces, should be seen not only as a proof of his personal strength in Russia, but also a limitation on his room for maneuver. If confronted by a NATO intervention, he would have no choice but to respond by escalating. A further hardening of Russia’s position would generate the potential for spillover in other states that Russia considers within its sphere of interest. Thus, overly aggressive NATO moves in reaction to Moscow’s moves could have a negative impact on developments relating to Transnistria, South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
source:https://www.boulevard-exterieur.com/Why-NATO-should-not-move-on-Crimea.html
The complexity of Africans' political relationships among themselves, then, influenced the nature of their resistance to colonial rule. As they resisted European invasions, they confronted both European and African soldiers. ... The power was European, but the face of it on the local level was often African.
King Arther was a king of a broken kingdom but one day he saw the sword in the stone and he pulled it out
America must extend commercial relations with Europe while insuring that the US has as little to do with European politics as possible. This is because if America gets too involved with European politics, then the US will lose more money in European wars that do not truly affect them.
<span>Significance: This was the first principle of American foreign policy. Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.</span>
