Tehran, Iran (ignore these extra characters)
Answer:
The primary methods that the U.S. government, as well as individual reformers, used to deal with the perceived Indian threat to westward settlement were:
-The Indian removal act 1830.
- The treaties were signed for the indians to be asigned to reservations, and to be relocated. The treaties were not respected, the white americans would traspass their sacred lands.
- They would impose american cultural rituals and believes.
Explanation:
The Americans rejected the native americans and wanted to remove all of their cultural beliefs and rituals. They fear westward expantion so they took all the possible methods to avoid this, from trying to take them out of their lands, to forcing them to change their identity.
The Federalist <span> is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by </span>Alexander Hamilton<span>, </span>James Madison<span>, and </span>John Jay<span> promoting the </span>ratification<span> of the </span>United States Constitution<span>.</span>
Answer:
The purpose of the Declaration of Independence is to explain to foreign nations and King George III why the colonies had chosen to separate themselves from Great Britain and become independent.
A presidential inauguration is a ceremonial event centered on the formal transition of a new president into office, its important it’s seen as a celebration because it shows the start of a new president.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
