"Romeo and Juliet" is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare first published in 1597. It tells the romantic story between young Romeo and Juliet, two lovers whose families are mortal enemies.
Romeo's attitude toward love changes during the story-line. At first his attitude toward love is based on chasing a physical experience rather than a more deep one. Once he meets Juliet, this attitude changes drastically, as he starts to experience a deeper and more meaningful love feeling towards her, and becomes seriously about their life together as lovers. His attitude towards love is an intense and positive one.
On the other hand Mercutio's attitude toward love is a much more pessimistic and detached one than Romeo's. He is a practical character, and he views love as something annoying and meaningless.
Mercutio acts as a foil for Romeo because their views are completely the opposite. While Romeo is a romantic whose conception of love takes over his whole personality, Mercutio does not take love as something seriously. The foil works as a reinforcement of Romeo's intense feelings for Juliet, Mercutio's negativity when it comes to love just highlights how Romeo's viewpoint is the complete opposite, shows how much he is in love with Juliet.
Answer:
whatever he thought of go ask him ;)
Explanation:
1. The correct answer here is A that is Agreement.
An agreement in the business somewhat differs from its use in an ordinary circumstances. Agreement usually means understanding between two people but in business it is a negotiable thing and it has legal consequences. So if someone violates the agreement they can be persecuted or the agreement can be ended.
2. The correct answer here A that is the genuineness of assent.
For a contract to be valid both parties must willingly, clearly and completely accept the contract. There must not be any threatening and the contract must not be signed under duress. If the contract is a result of duress of one party the contract may be made void.
3. The correct answer here is A that is sue for breach of contract.
A contract between two parties does not have to be written as it can be both implied and oral. Here we have an oral contract between Nadia and her brother Paul. They orally agreed on a deal. The thing here is that oral agreements are also enforceable and people can sue the same way they would sue for a breach of a written contract.
4. The correct answer here is B that is the assignment.
In the field of law a party the assignor can transfer its rights a someone else who is termed the assignee. This is often used in the banking world as well in the world of real state. Here the rights in the contract also the benefits can be transferred in accordance to established and existing rules.
5. The correct answer here is C that is the incidental beneficiary.
An incidental beneficiary is a person who indirectly benefited from an agreement of other parties in this case Maria and the tree-removal service. The incidental beneficiary is not the who was intended to benefit but he did nevertheless. The more banal example would be a grandchild experiencing benefits of a deal his grandparents made that can be used by the entire family.
to learn you sometimes need to compete with others, but you can also do things your way and have it be fun at the same time, that is why science tends to be more fun to most
The answer is A. She is making a claim that is still arguable but a stated fact.
