Mitochondria and chloroplast have similar DNA, which is not evidence for the endosymbiotic origins of mitochondria and chloroplasts.
According to the endosymbiotic theory, a chloroplast and a mitochondria were the independent prokaryotes. Both can be ingested by a large prokaryote and resist digestion. As a result, they continued as endosymbionts and eventually lost some of their autonomic properties. They divide by binary fission, have their own genetic material, possess 70s ribosomes, and Both include their own transcriptional and translational machinery.
Therefore, considering endosymbiotic origin theory, Both Mitochondria and chloroplast have similar DNA is not a piece of evidence.
Learn more about endosymbiotic origins theory here
brainly.com/question/771962
#SPJ4
Answer:
D) Three of the reaction steps in gluconeogenesis would have prohibitively large, positive free energies if they used glycolytic enzymes for their catalysis.
Explanation:
The glycolytic enzymes catalyze the conversion of glucose to pyruvate, while gluconeogenesis enzymes catalyze the formation of carbohydrates from pyruvate.
Answer:
1. Ribose
Hope you have a great day :)
Prokaryotes and eukaryotes both have a plasma membrane, mitochondria, golgi apparatus, and endoplasmic reticulum in common. But, prokaryotes have cell walls, chloroplast, and larger vacuoles because they are plant cells and animals don't need chloroplast since they don't undergo photosynthesis and don't need to hold as much water in their vacuoles.
Answer:
Explanation:
Carbon can be continuously cycled, but energy cannot
Carbon in the feces of a top predator can be decomposed and used by primary producers in the form of CO2; the energy in the feces is used by the decomposers and is released as heat.
