Answer:
I believe it should be 32.9
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
4)
area of rhombus is base * height
here the base is 10 mm and height is 8 mm
using the formula: 8 * 10 = 80 mm²
5)






Answer:
Relative error = 0.0254 %
Step-by-step explanation:
Given details
Height of equipment from base is 104 ft
Elevation angle is 27.5 degree
From figure we have
.........1

x = 54.13 ft
differentiating 1st eq wrt x
![\frac{d}{dx} tan\theta = \frac{d}{dx} [\frac{x}{104}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bd%7D%7Bdx%7D%20tan%5Ctheta%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bd%7D%7Bdx%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B104%7D%5D)

Taken
for minute change


from 



Reltaive error

Relative error = 0.0254 %
Answer: kinda confused on the function do you have a question on a piece of paper or if it is computer then take a pic of the question and upload it
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
d. Ad hominem
Step-by-step explanation:
A fallacy can be defined as a mistaken or false belief that are based on illogical arguments or reasoning.
However, a lot of people might actually think it to be true but it isn't. There are various types of fallacy, these include;
I. Black or white.
II. Non sequitur.
III. Appeal to moderation.
IV. Bandwagon.
V. Appeal to authority.
VI. Straw man.
VII. Oversimplification or hasty generalization.
VIII. Appeal to ignorance.
IX. Appeal to pity.
X. Ad hominem.
Ad hominem can be defined as a type of fallacy in which the motive, character, or some other aspect of a person is attacked rather than his or her position.
This ultimately implies that, Ad hominem is typically based on prejudices, emotions, or feelings rather than appealing to reason, intellect or substance.
In this scenario, John Bardeen's research work at the Advanced Institute for Physics has progressed so slowly that even his colleagues call him a plodder. As a result, the speaker concluded that it's prudent at present not to take seriously his current theory on how strings constitute the smallest of subatomic particles. Thus, the logical fallacy described above is an ad hominem because John's slowness in his research work is bone of contention for the speaker rather than analyzing and concentrating on his theory about strings.