Answer:
1. What are the problems of buy nothing movement?
The problem of the buy nothing movement is that, while it has a positive side: the preoccupation with the enviromental degradation that the production of goods and services can cause, and the preoccupation with the personal degradation that consumerism can cause as well, it also has a negative side: the world economy depends on the production and consumption of goods and services, and buying less can mean having less jobs for people, and obviously those who are poorer would be the most affected.
Besides, the vast majority of people do not agree with the lifestyle that the movement promotes, and would rather keep buying goods and services.
2. How can you convince your friend about the buy nothing movement?
The easiest way would be to talk to them about the enviromental degradation that overspending and overproduction can cause. Your friend does not necessarily have to become part of the buy nothing movement, but could simply become a more responsible consumer.
Answer:
Hey there!
First, a little background of this story. This story was written a long, long time ago by Native Americans of the Iroquois Tribe. It was passed down generation by generation, until in the 1800's a Iroquois writer wrote about it. One thing the story wants to explain is why there is land on earth, and the origins of the land.
At the beginning of the story, "The world on the turtle's back," we are told that in the beginning, there was nothing, but there was a "Sky World." Here, lived gods, who were like normal people. However, when a woman falls to the "Normal World" she is saved by birds, and placed on the turtle's back. The story goes on to tell, that a muskrat brings her soil, which she used to build the land. That is why, the land formed.
Let me know if this helps :)
1. the second one 2.the second one 3. not sure but I think its the first one 4. the first one 5. not sure but I think its the second one
Answer:
I think B.Evelyn was not not familiar with the procedure
Explanation:
I think this because in this sentece is says "... was not not..." it is not sopposed to say not twice.
The giver no longer has that memory once the giver gives it away.
So true
