Choose the best answer:
Review the argument.
Claim #1: David likes peanut butter.
Claim #2: Some people who like peanut butter are jk word.
Conclusion: David is a jk word.
Which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument?
A preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Analogy is used in a reflective essay when two unlike things are compared or there is comparison of benefits and losses. In other way it can be said that it explains the depth of the concept by comparing it to another. Analogy can compare anything till it supports the meaning of essay
Hence, option B is correct
