According to a source, the line that best supports the analysis is that it is based on the credible information that pertains to the account given.
Moreover, to provide a concrete and verifiable evidence to support the analysis the information should be reliable and valid to all possible angles of the evidence.
There are three ways in which the statement can be re-written to eliminate the sentence error.
<span>1. Jose and Marta volunteered at the local food bank. They now want to organize a canned food drive to increase the bank's food supply.
2. Jose and Marta volunteered at the local food bank; they now want to organize a canned food drive to increase the bank's food supply.
3. Jose and Marta volunteered at the local food bank, and they now want to organize a canned food drive to increase the bank's food supply.</span>
The <span>sentence that is an example of third-person narration is...
A ) <em>"Corrine laughed when she told him that she wouldn't go to the dance with him."</em>
"I laughed as I told him..." is first-person.
"You laughed as you told him..." is second-person.
"No way am I..." is first-person.
This proves my answer is correct.
- Marlon Nunez</span>
The sentence that contains a misplaced or dangling modifier is the one that follows:
B. Being from a small town in Wisconsin, the subway was a new experience for Matt.
All the information which appears before the comma (being from a small town in Wisconsin) seems to be related to the subway, and not to Matt, since "the subway" appears right after it. Obviously, the purpose was to use a modifier (the whole clause, in this particular case) in order to give information about Matt, and not about the subway. A better way to convey the idea originally intended would be:
Being from a small town in Wisconsin, Matt experienced the subway as something new.
1. Fourth
2. Wish
3. Stench
4. Path
5. Pinch
—————
Circle 2, 3, 5, and 6
—————
1. He
2. Her
3. They
4. Them
5. It’s
