Answer:
Brayden should dispose of the gum
Explanation:
In the given scenario the law in Singapore states that having chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should comply with the law there.
The equal protection clause is a provision of law that states that all citizens must be treated equally under the law.
Although this gives one the right to take retain actions, in this case Brayden will be restricted from having chewing gum.
Of he is allowed to carry chewing gum then he expects to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This violates the equal protection clause
Parliament has the ability to tax citizens
It is tough to answer this question because there are so many options based on what you want to do.
If you want to research prices, www.wine-searcher.com is the most complete price comparison website. If you are going to buy a lot of wine, their Professional version is worth it.
If you want to track your wine collection, read user reviews, or see basic product information... www.cellartracker.com is the best site.
If you want to learn about wine, there are endless websites that could be useful. You need to try wine to learn about it. To read about wine, I read Alder Yarrow's Vinography wine blog, Tyler Colman's Dr. Vino wine blog, and a few other wine blogs.
If you want to engage with other wine enthusiasts (especially the geekier ones), check out wineberserkers.com.
For expert advice, you can go to WineSpectator.com, eRobertParker.com, jancisrobinson.com... or some of the regional specialists like RhoneReport, and Burghound.
Answer:
A precedent.
Legal decisions made by judges in court cases are called precedents.
I hope this helped at all.
