1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leonid [27]
3 years ago
15

Getting ready for his semester studying abroad in Singapore, Brayden buys a pack of gum to help pop his ears on the flight. When

he lands in Singapore and goes through customs, he is advised that he must throw away the gum or be at risk of committing a crime. Why would Brayden want to throw away the gum, even though he just purchased it? Gum is illegal in all countries and he should not have purchased it. Brayden does not want to go against the norms in Singapore. While gum is not illegal in many places, it is against the law in Singapore. Brayden should not have to dispose of the gum because it is his right to have it.
Law
1 answer:
Margaret [11]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Brayden should dispose of the gum

Explanation:

In the given scenario the law in Singapore states that having chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should comply with the law there.

The equal protection clause is a provision of law that states that all citizens must be treated equally under the law.

Although this gives one the right to take retain actions, in this case Brayden will be restricted from having chewing gum.

Of he is allowed to carry chewing gum then he expects to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This violates the equal protection clause

You might be interested in
The most popular mortgage that has a fixed interest rate and<br> a loan period of thirty years?
Kamila [148]

Answer:

Traditional Mortgage

Explanation:

Traditional mortgages are simply constructed, with a mortgagor borrowing money at a fixed or variable interest rate and repaying the debt over time. ... These mortgages have less stringent asset and income restrictions. However, there is a cost: the lender can charge the borrower a higher interest rate.

3 0
2 years ago
Mr. Lynn, an agent for Acme Insurance, Inc. thinks that, since state laws are preempted concerning the marketing of Medicare hea
n200080 [17]

What might you, as his colleague, advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is: d. Organizations sponsoring Medicare health plans are responsible for the behavior of their contracted representatives and will be conducting monitoring activities to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal law and guidance and plan policies. Furthermore, state agent licensure laws are not preempted and he must abide by their requirements.

<h3>What is medicare?</h3>

A medicare can be defined as a health insurance coverage that help to cover medical expenses.

Based on the given scenario what  you might  advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is that company that is incharge of the medicare plan are the one incharge of the representatives behavior.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about medicare here:brainly.com/question/1960701

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Question 6
OleMash [197]

Answer:

what is a gender based violence

7 0
2 years ago
When gathering information about certain occupations, be sure to understand how you are paid. What is the difference between a s
defon

Answer:

The main difference between a salary and an hourly wage is that when someone is being paid monthly it means that their salary is fixed, meaning that the amount of money they get at the end of the month is not prone to changes. On the other hand, we have a wage earner who is paid by the hour of a specific work they do. It means that if they work 40 hours per week, they will get a certain amount of money but if they work an hour or two longer, they have the right to recieve that extra pay.

4 0
3 years ago
if the action is based on new york state law, does the new york trial court have both subject and personal jurisdiction over the
kifflom [539]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Every state court in the United States have jurisdiction over the persons within the territory. The court must have both personal jurisdiction as well as subject jurisdiction so as to have a jurisdiction over a case.

Any court can exercise personal jurisdiction over any defendant unless the statute exists in forum state which explicitly give authorization to the court to have personal jurisdiction over that particular defendant. A defendant must not be a resident of the state in order to have a personal jurisdiction over him by the court.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the most important deterrent of classical theory?
    9·2 answers
  • Assault can be described as
    8·1 answer
  • After the initial walk-through, who is now in authority of the crime scene, securing the safety of both people and crime
    15·1 answer
  • The FBI lab is one of the largest in the world and handles over one million examinations yearly. True False
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a graduated sanction step?
    5·1 answer
  • I hate it<br> its sooodum
    14·2 answers
  • One major difference between civil and criminal cases is that:
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statement is true? a) Consideration need not be any particular value. b) Consideration should accord the
    15·1 answer
  • I need help with this.
    14·2 answers
  • Purchasing a bottle of milk from a grocery store is an example of a contract
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!