The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
- <u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/8369124
Isabel's family is wealthy and South African, whereas Thami's family is destitute and he does not live with his parents.
<h3>What is "My Children My Africa" about?</h3>
In the book, Isabel and Thami's argument on the disparities between men and women is eerily similar to the key topic in apartheid South Africa: whether and how to attain equality for black and white South Africans.
Isabel's family is wealthy and South African, whereas Thami's family is destitute and he does not live with his parents.
Thus, this is Thami's background to Isabel's, in the Book of My Children My Africa.
For more details regarding My Children My Africa, visit:
brainly.com/question/23945961
#SPJ1
I would say A however I am not sure
Answer:
B is your answer :)
Explanation:
Both parts of that sentence could stand alone as there own sentence.
Anarachy, Chaos, Disorder.
