1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aalyn [17]
3 years ago
8

Why were European nations less prosperous than the United States after World War I?

History
2 answers:
Tems11 [23]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Americans worked harder and were willing to work longer hours.

Explanation:

nignag [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It's "Europeans were struggling to recover from the devastation of World War I."

Explanation:

I took the quiz.

You might be interested in
The southern demand that slavery be allowed to expand into the territories seemed to be motivated by what
tatiyna
The fear that free territories could be used as bases for the spread of abolition into the South. 

Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
When did Alexander the Great take the throne? 536 BCE 436 BCE 336 BCE 236 BCE
choli [55]
He took throne after his fathers death in 336 BCE, therefore the answer would be 336 BCE.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
filipino president ferdinand marcos achieved power through the Huks, a revolutionary group. b. strongly supported free elections
blondinia [14]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Filipino president Ferdinand Macros served as the 10th President of the Philippines from 1965 to 1986.

He established the authoritarian regime

His regime was known for corruption and suppression of democratic rights

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which of the following describes a reason historians might want to use a primary source to study an event a) it does not need to
Setler79 [48]

The correct answer is C. It described the event as it was experienced at the time

Explanation:

A primary source is any source including documents, paintings, manuscripts, diaries or recordings that are created at the moment the event occurs. On the other hand, a secondary source is a document that is usually created to report, summarize, analyze a primary source. In comparison to secondary sources, primary sources are created when the even occurs and are closer to it, but usually more subjective. In the case of historians wanting to study an event a primary source has multiple advantages, one of this is that the document would reflect the way the event was experienced as the source is created at the same time the event occurs or short after this, and reported by someone who was part of the event, experience it or witness it in a closer way which provides a closer perspective of the event.

6 0
3 years ago
Hi there......<br><br>.........​
Lesechka [4]

Answer: hi

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Soft drinks cost $1.89 and refills cost $0.25 each. With $3.80 to spend on the soft drink and refills, what is the maximum numbe
    11·2 answers
  • Write a short paragraph comparing and contrasting the arguments that Roosevelt and Twain made about the occupation of the Philip
    6·2 answers
  • There Minoans were best known for
    9·1 answer
  • What were two ways that the Industrial Revolution caused Eauropeans to look for new colonies?
    5·1 answer
  • Shang kings believed that they
    14·1 answer
  • true or false: the treaty of versailles required that germany pay reparations or compensation to the allies
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the three branches of government interpret the Constitution?
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think tariffs were beneficial to the Republic of Texas? Why or why not?
    14·2 answers
  • "No taxation without representation" is a reference to which belief held by many American colonists in the 1770's?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the answer to this PLZ dont put a link
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!