Answer:
I think it is B.
Explanation:
By process of elimination. It doesn't do any of the things mentioned in the other options.
It DOES NOT give future insight... (A)
It does show changes in U.S. agriculture. (B)
It DOES NOT identify different herbicides. (C)
It DOES NOT explain insect-resistant crops. (D)
and It DOES NOT clarify how to handle changes. (E)
Hope this helps!
What Martin's questions reveal about her point of view toward Bates' work is that:
- Some inmates were able to relate to some of Shakespeare's works than many scholars because such inmates had such similar experiences.
This question is related to "Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison"
<h3>About "Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison"</h3>
"Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison" is an article that was written by Mitchel Martin who interviewed Laura Bates.
Laura Bates is known to be author of “Shakespeare Saved My Life: Ten Years of Solitary with the Bard." In the story, she shared how she successfully taught Shakespeare works to inmates in a maximum security prison.
With her interaction with Martin, we discover that Bates' work reveal that the prisoners could relate to some of the events that transpired in some of Shakespeare's plays because they've had similar experiences before.
Learn more about Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison on brainly.com/question/11944939
You have to tell us the statements