1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetradugi [14.3K]
2 years ago
6

In which country on the graph was the recent voter turnout 83 percent?

Law
1 answer:
CaHeK987 [17]2 years ago
6 0
America had 83% voter turnout
You might be interested in
Which is the BEST explanation for the reason our "Founding Fathers" built a system of checks and balances into our government?Th
AlekseyPX

Answer:

The answer is D.) They felt that a system of "checks and balances" would help the executive branch become the most powerful of the three branches.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :))

3 0
3 years ago
*Match these items.*
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

The correct matching sequence of the items is as follow:

1. negate, destroy   ⇒    a. nullify

2. guideline document in judicial review   ⇒  c. u.s. constitution

3. chosen, appointed  ⇒  e. nominated

4. head of Armed Forces   ⇒  b. president

5. interprets the meaning of laws and administrative rules

and regulations   ⇒  d. statutory construction

6. gives power to the judicial system of courts   ⇒  f. article III of the constitution

Explanation:

  • Nullify means to negate and destroy.
  • The constitution refer to the guideline document in judicial review.
  • Nominate means to appoint or chose.
  • According to Law, the president of the United States is president.
  • Statutory construction means interpreting the meaning of laws and administrative rules and regulations.
  • Article III of the constitution gives power to the judicial system of courts.  

8 0
3 years ago
3. Why was MoCulloch y, Maryland a landmark federalism casa?
Anvisha [2.4K]

i think the answer is C since it makes sense too the answer unlike the others

5 0
3 years ago
Need help with this question, i'll give branliest.
xenn [34]
Well the two patterns are when it turns into a caterpillar, and the second would be when it breaks out of the cocoon to turn into a beautiful butterfly
4 0
2 years ago
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, one should
    11·1 answer
  • What to look out for in mortgage fraud
    7·2 answers
  • In the U.S.,The South Carolina state constitution is the supreme law of the land?
    11·1 answer
  • The possession of ____ is against federal law.
    11·1 answer
  • Military discipline is vital to the combat readiness of any military force. What does discipline stand for?
    14·2 answers
  • What is a possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional conduct by a school employee?
    8·1 answer
  • FORUM DESCRIPTION
    15·1 answer
  • Cases involving foreign governments or state v. state have original jurisdiction in the U.S. Supreme Court.
    15·1 answer
  • Which president signed the Community Mental Health Centers Act in order to
    5·1 answer
  • If police only tend to focus on high crime neighborhoods, could this lead to racial profiling?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!