Answer:
I think the answer is public nuisance.
Explanation:
I believe this because it is not an invasion of privacy at all, it can't be trespassing because she is not trespassing, it is not intentional even though she did ignore your claims.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
A. <u>Vehicles</u><u> </u><u>going</u><u> </u><u>in </u><u>the </u><u>direction</u><u> </u><u>of </u><u>the </u><u>arrow</u><u> </u><u>must </u><u>stop </u><u>if </u><u>they </u><u>can.</u><u> </u><u>The </u><u>arrow </u><u>will </u><u>soon</u><u> </u><u>be </u><u>red.</u>
Answer: I would think yes.
Explanation:
Answer and explanation:
The statute of frauds requires certain types of contracts to be in writing, but there exceptions. One of those would be the situation of working for an employer for the rest of your life.
This is an oral employement contract scenario and doesn't necessarily must be written in order for it to be enforceable. For this contract to be, in fact, enforceable, the promise should be crystal clear about the employer's right to extinguish.
Answer:
The main difference between a salary and an hourly wage is that when someone is being paid monthly it means that their salary is fixed, meaning that the amount of money they get at the end of the month is not prone to changes. On the other hand, we have a wage earner who is paid by the hour of a specific work they do. It means that if they work 40 hours per week, they will get a certain amount of money but if they work an hour or two longer, they have the right to recieve that extra pay.