1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
konstantin123 [22]
3 years ago
9

US marshals are nominated by

Law
2 answers:
mestny [16]3 years ago
8 0
Head of the us marshals service
lions [1.4K]3 years ago
3 0
The President nominated US Marshals and the senate approved them.
You might be interested in
When you park on a hill, the direction your are pointed determines
frozen [14]
Hello:) the vehicle will roll DOWN the hill. No matter if your facing down or up the hill, the car will roll! Be careful your brakes don’t fail on a hill;) good luck!! Hopefully this helped!
4 0
3 years ago
Government Question - What can a President do when working with a Congress that is not very cooperative?
djverab [1.8K]
The president can set certain rules, instructions and regulations- Those do not require approval by the Congress
5 0
3 years ago
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
the tea act of 1773 lifted duties on imported tea by india company, thus making imported tea more expensive and, thus, boosting
patriot [66]

The Tea Act of 1773 eliminated tariffs on tea imported by the India Company, raising the price of foreign tea and so stimulating the local tea industry. Puritan ideas and Neo-classical motifs both impacted Wheatley's poetry.

<h3>What was permitted under the Tea Act of 1773 for the company?</h3>

The Tea Act was enacted by the British Parliament in 1773 in an effort to salvage the struggling business. The law gave the firm permission to export its tea without first landing it in England, straight to the colonies.

<h3>What was the Tea Act's primary goal?</h3>

The Tea Act of 1773 (13 Geo 3 c 44) was enacted by the British Parliament. The main goal was to lessen the enormous volume of tea held by the British East India Company, which is struggling financially.

To know more about The Tea Act visit:-

brainly.com/question/5567830

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
A plaintiff sued a defendant for battery. At trial, the plaintiff's witness testified that the defendant had made an unprovoked
jasenka [17]

Answer: It is a proper question

Explanation:

The witness is making a claim about what had transpired between the defendant and the plaintiff and in order for their testimony to stand, they need to have integrity such that a reasonable person can believe their testimony in this case.

In asking about the false claim that the witness had once filed, the defendant is trying to establish that the witness has no integrity and so in proving their untruthfulness, the defendant hopes to convince the court that the witness does not have enough integrity to be a witness.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you're convicted of DUI a second or subsequent time,
    13·2 answers
  • Can i drive to school and work with my learners permit? florida
    7·1 answer
  • Which system seems to give the most power to the legislative branch?
    9·1 answer
  • Acharges
    14·1 answer
  • Please help I am confused
    5·1 answer
  • Please help, i need to have this done today....
    9·1 answer
  • I want to be a lawyer:) does anybody have like tips or whatever im only in 8th grade but i want to be prepared lol
    6·1 answer
  • Science matter is everywhere
    14·1 answer
  • Which hate crime category is most likely to result in murder?
    9·2 answers
  • My Dad is coming back ?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!