<span>This touches on the main issue of balancing the rights of all citizens. As a society we are guaranteed public rights for the good of the group. As individuals, we are guaranteed rights to preserve our own freedom. In this example and in so many others, it is important to balance the right of freedom of the press with the freedom of a free and fair trial.</span>
Answer:
a) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.
Explanation:
A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: "Citizens of our state are thriving. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefitted from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term."
This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism? It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.The senator's argument says that the condition which is low unemployment in the state is the effect of his economic packages, but the condition existed before he ever had the chance to introduce those packages. That is the major flaw of this argument.
Preamble I believe is it looking for a document? If so this should be it :D
435 voting members. 100 members in the senate. 5 delegates. Therefore, do that math. 435-105= the amount of other voters.
