Answer:
The first answer is the one which describes this the best.
Explanation:
The strongest connection is based on the main character in the book it also depends on how the book is wrote
Answer:
Minor v. Happersett (1874)
Explanation:
This court case was presented on appeal by Virginia Minor, a member of the National Woman Suffrage Association, after being denied registration to vote in St. Louis in 1872. She sued Reese Happersett because he was the voting registrar.
The case was not successful at the time, as the Supreme Court ruled that women´s right to vote was not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which showed the court was not the place to fight for voting rights for women.
The following actions were centered on the review of state voting laws and the ratification of an amendment to the Constitution. It wouldn´t be until 1920 that Minor v. Happersett was overruled by the Nineteenth Amendment that prohibited discrimination in voting rights based on sex.
Answer: The Roman Empire's legal system is a major influence on modern
European court systems.
Explanation:
Among the examples cited above, laws enacted by various Roman legislators have historical continuity. Laws developed primarily along the Roman Empire, and later gradually entered into the legal framework of many states.
True, its more extensive use of the law began in the 12th century, but since its inception, the rules have maintained continuity. Justinian's lawyers are the cornerstone of modern laws across Europe (and beyond) that are still in use today.
