A given rational function may or may not have a vertical asymptote (depending upon whether the denominator ever equals zero), but (at this level of study) it will always have either a horizontal or else a slant asymptote.
Answer:
<u>The balance in dollars and cents in Mr. Jenkins’s account at the end of 4 years was $ 1,462.50</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Let's review the information given to us to answer the question correctly:
Initial deposit = $ 1,250
Interest rate = 4.25% annual simple = 0.0425
Time of investment = 4 years
2. What was the balance in dollars and cents in Mr. Jenkins’s account at the end of 4 years?
Let's recall the simple interest formula, as follows:
A = P * (1 + rt), where:
A = final amount
P = initial principal balance
r = annual interest rate
t = time (in years)
Replacing with the values we know:
A = P * (1 + rt)
A = 1,250 * (1 + 4 * 0.0425)
A = 1,250 * 1.17
A = 1,462.50
<u>The balance in dollars and cents in Mr. Jenkins’s account at the end of 4 years was $ 1,462.50</u>
ANSWER
m < -2
EXPLANATION
We want to find the solution set for m in:
First, collect like terms:
Now, divide both sides by -3. When you divide an inequality by a negative number, <em>the sign changes direction</em>:
This means that all values of m must be less than -2.
<em>None of the options contains the correct solution set.</em>
<span>i think its the outcomes do not appear to be equally likely, so a uniform probability model is not a good model to represent probabilities in Tessa's experiment.<span>
</span></span>
Yes I believes so I hope I helped ya
